中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 579-586. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201512141170

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》作者学术不端知行信调查

邓瑶,朱宏儒,洪青标()   

  1. 江苏省血吸虫病防治研究所《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》编辑部,无锡市梅园杨巷117号 214064
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-14 修回日期:2016-03-09 出版日期:2016-06-15 发布日期:2016-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 洪青标 E-mail:qb_hong@126.com
  • 作者简介:邓 瑶(0000-0002-8784-6185),硕士,助理研究员,编辑,E-mail: denyy1982@163.com|朱宏儒,硕士,研究实习员,编辑
  • 基金资助:
    2014年度江苏省期刊协会研究课题(2014JSQKB043)

Investigation on the know ledge, attitude, practice about academ ic m is conduct among authors of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control

DENG Yao,ZHU Hongru,HONG Qingbiao()   

  1. Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control, Jiangsu Institute of Schistosomiasis, 117 Yangxiang, Meiyuan,Wuxi214064,China
  • Received:2015-12-14 Revised:2016-03-09 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2016-06-15
  • Contact: HONG Qingbiao E-mail:qb_hong@126.com

摘要:

【目的】了解《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》作者学术不端知识(Knowledge)、态度(Attitude)、行为(Practice)(知行信,KAP)状况,为遏制学术不端行为、净化学术风气提供参考。【方法】自行设计作者学术不端KAP调查表,以近4年在该刊发表论文的作者为调查对象,通过发送E-mail对其开展问卷调查。【结果】大多数作者对学术不端行为持抵制态度,但对学术不端现象的认识尚不全面,尤其是在参考文献引用、自我剽窃,肢解型、变换语种型一稿多投、合作署名方面还存在一些认识和行为上的误区。【结论】要遏制学术不端行为,除依靠作者加强自律,学术期刊加强宣传及审查外,还有赖于学术评价机制及相关监督、惩戒制度的完善。

关键词: 学术不端, 学术道德, 作者, 知识, 态度, 行为, 问卷调查, 《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to understand the know ledge, attitude, practice(KAP) about academic misconduct among the authors of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control.[Methods] The writers who contributed to the journal in recent four years were selected and investigated by a questionnaire survey through e-mails.[Findings] Most of the authors resisted academic misconduct,but their know ledge on academic misconduct was not comprehensive.There were some misunderstandings on reference citation, self-plagiarism, duplicate submission with different languages and dismembering papers, and co-signature.[Conclusions] In order to control academic misconduct, the authors should increase self-discipline, and the academic journals should strength the propaganda of academic morality and scrutiny of papers.In addition,relevant departments should improve the academic evaluation mechanism as well as the supervision and punishment system.

Key words: Academic misconduct, Academic morality, Author, Know ledge, Attitude, Practice, Questionnaire survey, Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control