摘要：

目的 测度智库期刊发展水平，为智库期刊建设提供数据参考。 方法 以《智库期刊群（2.0版）》入选期刊为研究对象，综合考虑指标代表性、数据可得性、决策关联性及社会服务性，构建量化指标体系，通过熵值法赋权并计算综合得分。 结果 指标体系由决策关注度等4个一级指标、前瞻指数等12个二级指标、前瞻文献等18个三级指标构成。样本分项得分及综合得分数据平均值均大于中位数，即“关键少数”期刊拉高了整体样本平均值。《中国科学院院刊》综合得分及决策关注度排名第1，《管理世界》《经济研究》《系统工程理论与实践》分别在学术辐射度、社会传播度及国际显示度排名第1，为智库期刊发展提供了案例借鉴。 结论 智库期刊发展不均衡态势明显，未来建议成立实体“智库期刊建设专家委员会”，公开评价指标，为智库期刊建设提供更为具体的努力方向。

关键词: 智库期刊, 决策关注度, 学术辐射度, 社会传播度, 国际显示度

Abstract:

Purposes To measure the development level of think tank journals and provide data references for their construction. Methods Taking the journals included in the “China Think Tank Journal Cluster （2.0）” as research subjects， a comprehensive evaluation system was established by comprehensively considering index representativeness， data availability， decision-making relevance， and social serviceability. A quantitative index system was constructed， and the entropy method was used for weighting to calculate the comprehensive scores. Findings The index system consists of 4 first-level indicators （e.g.， decision-making attention）， 12 second-level indicators （e.g.， forward-looking index）， and 18 third-level indicators （e.g.， forward-looking Literature）. For the samples， the mean values of the four specific scores and the comprehensive score were all greater than the medians， indicating that the “critical few” journals elevated the sample averages.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences ranked first in both comprehensive score and decision-making attention； while Journal of Management World， Economic Research Journal， and Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice ranked first in academic radiation， social dissemination， and international visibility， respectively. The above journals provided case studies for the development of think tank journals. Conclusions The imbalancedevelopment of think tank journals is evident. It is recommended to establish a physical “Expert Committee for Think Tank Journal Construction”， which will publicly select evaluation indicators to provide more specific directions for journal development.

Key words: Think tank journals, Attention to decision-making, Academic radiation, Social dissemination, International visibility