中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 284-294. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202409261071

• 数字出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

国际科研机构预印本政策分析及实施建议

张梦婷1,2,3)()(), 张智雄1,2,3),*()()   

  1. 1) 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区北四环西路33号 100190
    2) 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京市海淀区北四环西路33号 100190
    3) 国家新闻出版署学术期刊新型出版与知识服务重点实验室,北京市海淀区北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-26 修回日期:2025-02-10 出版日期:2025-03-15 发布日期:2025-04-01
  • 通讯作者: * 张智雄(ORCID: 0000-0003-1596-7487),博士,研究馆员,中国科学院文献情报中心副主任,E-mail:zhangzx@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:

    张梦婷(ORCID: 0000-0002-9941-7548),博士研究生,E-mail:

    作者贡献声明: 张梦婷:设计研究方案,资料收集与整理,论文撰写和修改; 张智雄:提出研究方向和研究框架,修改论文,审定论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金“预印本学术交流的理论和实践研究”(19BTQ006)

Analysis of preprint policies of international research institutions and implementation suggestions

ZHANG Mengting1,2,3)()(), ZHANG Zhixiong1,2,3)()()   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    3) Key Laboratory of New Publishing and Knowledge Services for Scholarly Journals, National Press and Publication Administration, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2024-09-26 Revised:2025-02-10 Online:2025-03-15 Published:2025-04-01

摘要:

【目的】总结当前国际科研机构对预印本的态度及其政策要点,为我国科研机构制定和完善预印本政策提供参考和借鉴。【方法】基于Nature Index和QS世界大学排名评估科研机构的学术影响力和国际认可度,并结合是否已正式发布预印本相关政策的标准,最终选取19个国际科研机构作为研究对象,梳理归纳其对预印本的态度及其政策要点。【结果】多数国际科研机构认可并鼓励预印本交流,并在引用、存储、发布、评审和出版等方面制定了具体规范和指导措施。【结论】我国科研机构在制定预印本政策时,应充分认识到预印本的概念正发生变化,明确政策导向,以提升科研人员对预印本的认可度和使用意愿,积极支持基于预印本的同行评审模式建设,并鼓励预印本交流与期刊论文交流相结合。

关键词: 国际科研机构, 预印本政策, 政策分析, 实施建议

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to summarize the attitudes of international research institutions toward preprints and the key points of their preprint policies, providing reference and guidance for Chinese research institutions in formulating their preprint policies. [Methods] Research institutions were selected based on their academic influence and international recognition, as measured by the Nature Index and QS world university rankings, along with the criterion of having officially issued preprint-related policies, resulting in a final sample of 19 international research institutions, whose attitudes toward preprints and key policy points were analyzed and summarized. [Findings] The majority of international research institutions acknowledge and encourage preprint-based academic exchanges. They have established specific regulations and guidelines concerning preprint citation, storage, release, review and publication. [Conclusions] In formulating preprint policies, Chinese research institutions should fully recognize the evolving concept of preprints, establish clear policy guidance to enhance researchers' acceptance and use of preprints, actively support the development of peer review mechanisms for preprints, and promote the integration of preprint communication with journal publication.

Key words: International research institutions, Preprint policies, Policy analysis, Implementation suggestions