中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 692-700. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202309190754

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

2017—2022年我国人文社会科学英文期刊的现状及分析

余倩()()   

  1. 中国社会科学院中国社会科学评价研究院,北京市东城区建国门内大街5号 100732
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-19 修回日期:2024-03-19 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-11
  • 作者简介:

    余倩(OCRID:0000-0002-1338-9188),硕士,副研究员,E-mail:

Status and analysis of English journals of humanities and social sciences in China from 2017 to 2022

YU Qian()()   

  1. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Evaluation Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 5 Jianguomennei Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100732, China
  • Received:2023-09-19 Revised:2024-03-19 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-06-11

摘要:

【目的】调查我国(不含港澳台地区)人文社会科学英文期刊的基本情况,汇总、梳理我国英文期刊的发展现状和面临的问题,尝试为我国英文期刊的高质量发展提出思考和建议。【方法】利用统计分析方法结合文献调研、数据分析和对比方法对我国主办的148种人文社会科学英文期刊开展调研和分析。【结果】人文社会科学英文期刊的数量持续增长,被SSCI收录的数量也明显增长。英文期刊的出版周期仍以季刊为主,主办单位多为高校和科研机构,主办单位集中在京沪两地,近七成期刊“借船出海”。与此同时,英文期刊还存在总数偏少、近2/3的期刊仅有ISSN号、学科分布不均、政策扶持力度较小等问题。【结论】为建设高品质英文社科期刊,应出台长期稳定的扶持政策、加强监管引导、注重人才队伍培养、制定科学评价体系、坚持“内容为王”、加强出版传播平台建设。

关键词: 人文社会科学期刊, 英文社科期刊, 高品质期刊, 科学评价体系, 出版平台建设

Abstract:

[Purposes] The study investigates the basic situation of English journals of humanities and social sciences in China (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan; abbreviated as CEJHSS), summarizes and clarifies the development status and challenges faced by CEJHSS, and attempts to provide thoughts and suggestions for the high-quality development of CEJHSS. [Methods] Through the statistical analysis, 148 CEJHSS were investigated and analyzed combined with literature research, data analysis, and comparison. [Findings] The number of CEJHSS has continued to grow, and the number included in SSCI has also increased significantly. Quarterly publication remains dominant among CEJHSS, with sponsoring units primarily being universities and research institutions, concentrated in Beijing and Shanghai. Nearly 70% of journals go global by leveraging other platforms. At the same time, CEJHSS still face issues such as a relatively small total number, with nearly two-thirds of journals having only ISSN numbers, uneven distribution across disciplines, and relatively weak policy support. [Conclusions] To build high-quality CEJHSS, it is imperative to establish long-term and stable support policies, strengthen supervision and guidance, pay attention to talent cultivation, formulate a scientific evaluation system, prioritize content quality, and strengthen publishing and dissemination platform construction.

Key words: Journal of humanities and social sciences, English journal of social sciences, High-quality journal, Scientific evaluation system, Publishing platform construction