中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 806-812. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202205170392

• 科技期刊运营机制研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

国外典型高校出版社期刊学科专业布局对比研究及启示

张广萌()(), 张莉, 陈禾, 赵琳   

  1. 清华大学出版社有限公司,北京市海淀区双清路学研大厦 100084
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-17 修回日期:2022-06-10 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-08-01
  • 作者简介:张广萌(ORCID:0000-0003-2214-2133),硕士,副编审, E-mail: zhanggm@tup.tsinghua.edu.cn;
    张 莉,硕士,期刊中心副主任;
    陈 禾,博士,期刊中心副主任;
    赵 琳, 硕士,编辑。
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度中国科技期刊卓越行动计划选育高水平办刊人才子项目-青年人才支持项目“清华大学出版社以域育刊、以刊带群高质量发展模式探索”(2021ZZ053108)

Comparative study of discipline distribution of journals of typical foreign university presses and its inspiration

ZHANG Guangmeng()(), ZHANG Li, CHEN He, ZHAO Lin   

  1. Tsinghua University Press, Xueyan Building, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2022-05-17 Revised:2022-06-10 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-08-01

摘要:

【目的】 对国外典型高校出版社期刊布局进行对比研究和特点提炼,为国内高校出版社优化期刊布局、实现高质量发展提出建议。【方法】 采用数据分析、案例探究和对比研究方法,按出版规模分层次对牛津大学出版社、剑桥大学出版社、麻省理工学院出版社、洛克菲勒大学出版社的期刊布局进行研究,得出启示。【结果】 国外典型高校出版社期刊布局呈现出科技期刊和社科期刊布局均衡,重视优势学科、基础学科和新兴交叉学科领域期刊布局的特点,期刊布局中专业化学科集聚特色显著,并跨越传统学科,推出新期刊概念以更好地应对开放科学发展。【结论】 高校出版社应分阶段做好科学合理的期刊布局:细分学科领域,面向优势学科、新兴交叉学科和基础学科领域,以域育刊;单刊和集群联动,以刊带群形成完整知识服务网络体系;具备一定水平和规模后,均衡布局科技期刊和社科期刊,以齐全的期刊学科门类、统一的办刊标准实现对学术资源的有效汇聚,服务于国家科技创新建设和研究成果的海内外传播。

关键词: 高校出版社, 期刊布局, 学科专业, 集群化发展

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper compares the discipline distribution of journals of typical foreign university presses, summarizes the problems, and puts forward suggestions for optimizing the discipline distribution of journals of university presses in China. [Methods] With the methods of data analysis, case study, and comparative study, we explored the disciplines of journals of Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, and Rockefeller University Press according to the publishing scale and drew conclusions. [Findings] The journals of typical foreign university presses feature balanced distribution of social science and natural science. Moreover, these presses emphasize preponderant disciplines, basic disciplines, and emerging interdisciplinary disciplines, and subdivide a preponderant discipline for further development. Furthermore, they design journals for solving basic problems, which are quite different from traditional journals, in response to open science. [Conclusions] University presses should make scientific and reasonable journal planning at different stages. To be specific, they should subdivide discipline and create journals on dominant disciplines, emerging interdisciplinary disciplines, and basic disciplines. Moreover, they should highlight both individual development and clustering development of journals to develop a complete knowledge service network. With a certain level and scale, they should balance natural science journals and social science journals and unify the standards for running journals to realize the effective aggregation of academic resources and serve national scientific and technological innovation and dissemination of research outcomes in China and abroad.

Key words: University press, Journal planning, Discipline, Clustering development