中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 795-805. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202205080359

• 科技期刊运营机制研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊出版诚信建设现状评估及发展建议

肖玥1,2)()(), 翁彦琴1,2),*(), 王治3)   

  1. 1)中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2)中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    3)中国科技出版传媒股份有限公司,北京中科期刊出版有限公司,北京市东城区东黄城根北街16号 100717
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-08 修回日期:2022-06-07 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 翁彦琴 E-mail:xiaoyue@mail.las.ac.cn;wengyq@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:肖 玥(ORCID:0000-0003-1442-8000),硕士研究生,E-mail: xiaoyue@mail.las.ac.cn;
    王 治,博士,编辑。
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度中国科技期刊卓越行动计划选育高水平办刊人才子项目-青年人才支持项目“科技期刊科研诚信体系建设及其在学术诚信体系中的作用研究”(2021ZZ053106)

Current situation evaluation and development suggestions of scientific journal publishing integrity

XIAO Yue1,2)()(), WENG Yanqin1,2),*(), WANG Zhi3)   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    3) China Science Publishing & Media Ltd., Beijing Zhongke Journal Publishing Co., Ltd., 16 Donghuangchenggen North Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100717, China
  • Received:2022-05-08 Revised:2022-06-07 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-08-01
  • Contact: WENG Yanqin E-mail:xiaoyue@mail.las.ac.cn;wengyq@mail.las.ac.cn

摘要:

【目的】 以涵盖科技期刊出版全流程的诚信制度与举措为切入点,综合评估我国科技期刊出版诚信建设现状,了解科技期刊诚信建设中的成效与短板,推进我国科技期刊诚信体系的规范化建设。【方法】 设计期刊层面的出版诚信问卷,通过问卷调研,了解各刊自评估与期刊整体诚信建设情况。【结果】 参与调研的科技期刊建设水平整体良好,具备基础制度与审查程序,但仍存在规定细粒度不足,举措开展与落实情况不透明等问题。其中卓越期刊率先建立较为完善的诚信体系,能够紧跟国际动态、推进新兴规范。【结论】 科技期刊出版诚信建设需做系统性设计,通过填补建设空白点和新兴点,提高全流程处理透明化和有序性,确保程序上能够防范学术不端等不良行为。同时,重视科技期刊在科研诚信体系建设中的能动性,发挥科技期刊的诚信教育引导作用,促进科研诚信生态环境的完善。

关键词: 科技期刊, 出版诚信, 出版流程, 问卷调查, 评估

Abstract:

[Purposes] According to the norms and measures for integrity in the whole publishing process of scientific journals, we assessed the publishing integrity of them in China and summarized the outcomes and weak links to enhance the standardized construction of journal integrity system in China. [Methods] Through questionnaire survey, we clarified the self-evaluated integrity and overall integrity of each journal. [Findings] The overall integrity construction of journals is at the medium level, as they all have basic norms and review procedures. However, they should further detail related requirements and make the implementation of the measures public. By contrast, journals included in the Excellence Action Plan for China STM Journals have taken the lead in establishing a complete integrity system, which can keep up with international trends and promote emerging norms. [Conclusions] For the publishing integrity, scientific journals should establish a system by all the integrity norms and measures in the publishing process, adding emerging norms, and making the whole process transparent and ordered. On this basis, academic misconduct can be avoided in the whole process. At the same time, journals should promote the improvement of scientific research integrity environment by exerting subjective initiative and giving full play to the guiding role in scientific integrity education.

Key words: Scientific journal, Publishing integrity, Publishing process, Questionnaire survey, Evaluation