中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1594-1602. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202108050612

• 评论与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内外开放同行评议研究的特征分析

李子星1,2), 刘筱敏1),*()   

  1. 1)中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2)中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-05 修回日期:2021-10-08 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2021-12-28
  • 通讯作者: 刘筱敏 E-mail:liuxm@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:李子星(ORCID:0000-0001-4986-6273),硕士研究生,E-mail: lizixing@mail.las.ac.cn

Analysis on the characteristics of open peer review at home and abroad

LI Zixing1,2), LIU Xiaomin1),*()   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2021-08-05 Revised:2021-10-08 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-28
  • Contact: LIU Xiaomin E-mail:liuxm@mail.las.ac.cn

摘要:

【目的】 分析国内外开放同行评议研究的分布规律及进展,揭示开放同行评议研究的现状与趋势。【方法】 以CNKI、WoS数据库收录的288篇开放同行评议领域的文献为研究对象,从发文量、发文机构、期刊分布、发文机构与发文期刊所属研究领域的关联关系等角度分析研究文献的分布特征,以关键词分布为切入点,围绕开放同行评议的模式、质量以及伦理问题对研究文献的内容进行深入分析。【结果】 开放同行评议整体发展处于上升趋势,以高等院校、出版机构为代表的多种类型机构开始关注、研究或实践开放同行评议模式,涉及医学卫生、图书情报、出版等领域,不同研究领域的发文机构与发文期刊之间存在一定的关联关系。国内外关于是否开放同行评议仍在探讨中,尚未形成统一的模式与框架,在出版伦理方面依旧存在很多问题。【结论】 建议我国学术期刊从公开评审报告开始,将“选择实名”纳入到同行评议过程,逐步推进学术共同体接受开放同行评议。

关键词: 开放同行评议, 研究进展, 对比分析

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the distribution and trend of research on open peer review in China and abroad. [Methods] A total of 288 articles on open peer review were retrieved from CNKI and WoS, and the distribution characteristics of them, including the number of publications, author affiliation, involved journals, and the association of author affiliation with the disciplines of journals, were analyzed. Focusing on keyword distribution, we expounded the content of these articles in terms of the mode, quality, and ethicality of open peer review. [Findings] Open peer review registers an upward trend. Typical institutions, such as higher education institutions and publishers turn to emphasize, study, or implement open peer review, which involves medicine and hygiene, library and information, and publishing. Authors of different research fields and journals of different disciplines are correlated. Whether to implement open peer review is still a debate in China and abroad, and no unified mode and framework have taken shape. Moreover, there are many problems in publishing ethics. [Conclusions] By making the review report public, China’s academic journals should incorporate the real name system and gradually implement open peer review among the academic community.

Key words: Open peer review, Research progress, Comparative analysis