中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1519-1526. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202106110480

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊稿件送审的现状、挑战与对策

王瑞   

  1. 广州医科大学附属第一医院广州呼吸健康研究院Journal of Thoracic Disease编辑部,广东省广州市越秀区沿江西路151号 510120
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-11 修回日期:2021-09-09 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2021-12-28
  • 作者简介:王 瑞(ORCID:0000-0003-4284-1281),硕士,编辑,E-mail: wangrui@gird.cn

Status quo and challenges of the assignment of manuscript review in scientific journals and countermeasures

WANG Rui   

  1. Editorial Office of Journal of Thoracic Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 151 Yanjiangxi Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2021-06-11 Revised:2021-09-09 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-28

摘要:

【目的】 分析国内外科技期刊稿件送审的现状与面临的挑战,并提出应对之策,以期为国内建立更完善的同行评议制度提供参考。【方法】 通过网络调研、文献调研与案例分析等方法,结合Journal of Thoracic Disease的相关经验,探讨科技期刊稿件送审的现状、挑战以及对策。【结果】 稿件送审工作面临多方面的挑战。稿件送审目前有由编委和编辑选择审稿人的传统模式以及作者选择审稿人、审稿人选择稿件等新模式。 【结论】 期刊可以采取创新送审模式、多维度考量审稿人与稿件的匹配度、尽可能规避利益冲突、保证审稿人的多样性、注意识别同行评议操纵以及选用审稿人自动匹配程序等对策来改善送审工作,提高同行评议的质量和效率。

关键词: 科技期刊, 同行评议, 稿件送审

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to analyze the status quo and challenges of the assignment of manuscript review across scientific journals in China and abroad and put forward countermeasures, which is expected to serve as a reference for improving the peer review system in China. [Methods] The current situation of and challenges for the assignment of manuscript review of scientific journals, as well as the countermeasures were analyzed with the methods of network research, literature research, and case analysis, and based on the experience of Journal of Thoracic Disease. [Findings] The assignment, facing various challenges, is implemented mainly in the following modes: conventional reviewer selection by editorial board members or editors and the emerging reviewer selection by authors and manuscript selection by reviewers.[Conclusions] Scientific journals should seek new modes for the assignment, improve the matching degree between the manuscript and the reviewer from multiple aspects, avoid conflicts of interest, ensure the diversity of reviewers, emphasize the identification of fake peer review, and adopt modern technology for automatic matching of reviewers and manuscripts, thereby optimizing the assignment of manuscript review and improving the quality and efficiency of peer review.

Key words: Scientific journal, Peer review, Assignment of manuscript review