摘要：

目的 探究期刊与基本科学指标（ESI）学科及教育部一流学科的互动关系，为 “双一流” 背景下高校学科建设与期刊发展的深度融合提供参考。 方法 以高校主办的“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划” 二期英文单刊为研究对象，利用ESI和InCites数据库，研究期刊与学科的匹配度以及对学科的贡献度。 结果 期刊学科覆盖呈现“工科主导”特征：材料科学和工程学类期刊占比最高；对一流学科发文与被引的贡献均值（4%和5%）高于对ESI学科发文与被引的贡献均值（2%和2.5%），显示其对国内学科体系更强的支撑能力。多数高校在其主办期刊上发文的学科规范化引文影响力（CNCI），高于其在学科整体及期刊自身的CNCI值，说明期刊已争取到主办高校的优质论文。 结论 高校英文期刊在支撑一流学科建设中发挥重要作用，但仍存在学科覆盖不均衡、基础学科期刊偏少等问题。建议推进高校期刊集群化建设、强化学科与期刊协同发展生态、优化期刊布局以填补学科空白，从而在“双一流”建设中实现资源整合、学术传播与国际影响力的全面提升。

关键词: 高校英文期刊, “双一流”建设, 一流学科建设, 期刊发展, 匹配度, 贡献度

Abstract:

Purposes This study aims to explore the interaction between scientific journals and disciplines， specifically essential science indicators （ESI） subject categories and China’s Ministry of Education’s first-class disciplines. It seeks to provide references for the deep integration of university discipline development and journal advancement within the context of the “Double First-Class”initiative. Methods The research objects were English-language single-journal titles from the second phase of the “Excellence Action Plan for China’s STM Journals” sponsored by Chinese universities. Using the ESI and InCites databases， the study investigated the alignment between the journals’subject coverage and the specified disciplines， as well as the journals’contribution to these disciplines in terms of publication output and citation impact. Findings The subject coverage of the journals exhibited a “dominance of engineering disciplines”， with journals in materials science and engineering constituting the highest proportion. The mean contribution of these journals to publication output and citations for first-class disciplines （4% and 5%， respectively） was higher than their mean contribution to ESI disciplines （2% and 2.5%， respectively）， indicating a stronger supportive role for the domestic discipline system. For most sponsoring universities， the category normalized citation impact （CNCI） of papers published in their sponsored journals was higher than both the overall CNCI of the university in that discipline and the journal’s own overall CNCI. This suggests that the journals have successfully attracted high-quality research output from their host institutions. Conclusions University-sponsored English journals play a significant role in supporting the development of first-class disciplines. However， challenges remain， including an uneven distribution of subject coverage and a relative shortage of journals in basic sciences. Recommendations are proposed to promote cluster-based development of university journals， strengthen the synergistic ecosystem between disciplines and journals， and optimize journal layouts to fill disciplinary gaps. These measures aim to achieve comprehensive improvement in resource integration， academic dissemination， and international influence within the “Double First-Class” construction framework.

Key words: English-language academic journals in universities, “Double First-Class” initiative, First-class discipline initiative, Journal development, Matching degree, Contribution degree