摘要： 【目的】 对农林高校主办的农业科学类期刊与农学学科的关联性进行分析,提出农林高校主办的农业科学类期刊布局策略。【方法】 以29所农林高校主办的农业科学类期刊、高校农学学科在第四轮学科评估中的评估结果以及第二轮“双一流”建设中的农学学科为研究对象,从宏观层面对比农业科学类期刊整体学科分布与高校农学学科整体分布情况,并从微观层面分析农业科学类综合性和专业性期刊与本校农学学科的关联情况。【结果】 与农林高校农学学科现状相比,高校主办的农业科学类高层次期刊在数量和学科布局方面都有提升空间。作物学、兽医学、畜牧学等优势学科相关期刊建设不足,农业资源与环境、草学等学科相关期刊出现空白。农业科学类综合性期刊占比较高,达到59.68%,各刊发文学科与第四轮学科评估结果中的学科体现出较均衡的关联性;专业性期刊建设体现出与本校优势学科的较强关联度。【结论】 应结合农林高校主办的农业科学类期刊与农学学科的关联性现状,加强顶层设计和宏观导向,集群发展、统筹布局;促进分级分类发展,优化农林高校主办农业科学类期刊的学科布局和层次布局;依托高校优势学科,强化期刊专业化学科特色。

关键词: 农林高校, 农业科学类期刊, 农学学科

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the relationship between agricultural science journals sponsored by agricultural and forestry universities and agricultural disciplines and put forward the layout strategy of agricultural science journals sponsored by agricultural and forestry universities. [Methods] Taking the agricultural science journals sponsored by 29 agricultural and forestry universities, the evaluation results of these universities in the fourth round of agricultural discipline evaluation, and the agricultural discipline in the second round of "double first-class" discipline construction as the research objects, the overall discipline distribution of the 29 agricultural science journals sponsored by these universities and that of agricultural disciplines in these universities were compared from the macro level. The relationship of agricultural science and professional journals with agricultural disciplines was analyzed from the micro level. [Findings] Compared with the current situation of agricultural disciplines in agricultural and forestry universities, the number and discipline of high-level agricultural science journals sponsored by these universities need to be further strengthened. The construction of relevant journals of crop science, veterinary medicine, animal science, and other dominant disciplines is insufficient, and there are gaps in the journals of agricultural resources and environment and grass science. The comprehensive journals of agricultural science account for a relatively high proportion, reaching 59.68%, and the literature discipline published by each university shows a relatively balanced correlation with the results of the fourth round of discipline evaluation. The construction of professional journals reflects the strong correlation with the dominant disciplines of the university. [Conclusions] The relationship between the agricultural science journals sponsored by agricultural and forestry universities and agricultural disciplines should be analyzed. The top-level design and macro-orientation should be strengthened, and cluster development and overall layout should be considered. The development of classification shall be promoted, and the discipline layout and level layout of agricultural science journals sponsored by agricultural and forestry universities shall be optimized. The dominant disciplines of universities can be relied on to highlight the features of specialized disciplines of journals.

Key words: Agricultural and forestry university, Agricultural science journal, Agricultural discipline