中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1369-1375. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202106220505

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术与评审:学术论文评审的演变及专家画像定量化指标的构建

孙红梅1)(), 刘荣2), 米然2), 黄小娟1), 范真真1,3), 侯磊1), 肖玲1), 佟建国1,3),*()   

  1. 1)《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》电子杂志社有限公司,北京市海淀区西小口路66号 100192
    2)中国科协学会服务中心,北京市海淀区学院南路86号 100081
    3)同方知网数字出版技术股份有限公司,北京市海淀区西小口路66号 100192
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-22 修回日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 佟建国 E-mail:shm8759@cnki.net;tjg10366@cnki.net
  • 作者简介:孙红梅(ORCID:0000-0002-1986-4437),博士,部门主任,E-mail: shm8759@cnki.net;|刘 荣,硕士,副编审;|米 然,硕士,编辑;|黄小娟,博士,编辑;|范真真,硕士,副编审;|侯 磊,硕士,高级工程师;|肖 玲,学士,部门副主任。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科协学会服务中心2020年度科技期刊项目“新一代科技期刊运营出版传播发展趋势研究”(2020XFKJQK03)

Evolution and development of peer review and establishment of quantitative indexes for expert portrait

SUN Hongmei1)(), LIU Rong2), MI Ran2), HUANG Xiaojuan1), FAN Zhenzhen1,3), HOU Lei1), XIAO Ling1), TONG Jianguo1,3),*()   

  1. 1)China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House (CAJEPH), 66 Xixiaokou Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100192, China
    2)Service Center for Societies of CAST, 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China
    3)Tsinghua Tongfang Digital Knowledge Network Technology Co., Ltd., 66 Xixiaokou Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100192, China
  • Received:2021-06-22 Revised:2021-09-17 Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-11-15
  • Contact: TONG Jianguo E-mail:shm8759@cnki.net;tjg10366@cnki.net

摘要:

【目的】 为了提高同行评审专家与所审学术论文研究方向的匹配度,改进和完善现有同行评审方法,探寻与时代和科学技术发展相适应的稿件评审模式。【方法】 调研分析传统同行评审存在的问题、同行评审的演变和发展趋势,并对专家匹配度中的定量化指标进行分析。【结果】 论文评审形式正经历从封闭性到开放性、从被动性到主动性,评审意见从静态化到动态性发展,从拒稿到分级评审以及从人工到智能等形式的演变。互联网和多媒体技术的快速发展和应用将推动构建健全、规范、合理、高效的同行评审体系,实现优秀科研成果的快速筛选和广泛传播。【结论】 论文引证标准化指数可以实现不同学科、不同年度论文之间的比较,h指数弥补了传统文献计量学单项数量指标只能体现数量的缺陷,可作为评审专家画像的定量化参数指标。

关键词: 同行评审, 专家画像, 智能筛选, 论文引证标准化指数(PCSI), h指标

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to improve the current peer review method and explore an advanced review mode, which is expected to increase the matching degree of research direction between the review experts and academic papers. [Methods] The problems, evolution, and development trend of conventional peer review were investigated and quantitative indexes for the matching degree of research direction between reviewers and academic papers were analyzed. [Findings] The review of academic papers is becoming open, active, dynamic, and cascading, with the gradual integration of artificial intelligence. The rapid development and application of the internet and new technologies enable a sound, standardized, reasonable, and efficient peer review system, allowing the rapid screening and wide dissemination of scientific research achievements. [Conclusions] Paper Citation Standardized Index (PCSI) can be used for comparing papers of different disciplines and published at different time. The h-index reflects not only the quantity but also the quality of papers, which is thus an ideal quantitative index for expert portrait.

Key words: Peer review, Expert portrait, Intelligent screening, Paper Citation Standardized Index (PCSI), h-index