中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 669-674. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201703210195

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用文献数据库加强审稿过程中的学术质量判断

朱银周   

  1. 《昆明理工大学学报》编辑部,云南省昆明市呈贡区景明南路727号 650500
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-21 修回日期:2017-05-16 出版日期:2017-07-15 发布日期:2017-07-15
  • 作者简介:朱银周(ORCID:0000-0002-9456-4725),学士,副编审,E-mail:sky- dragon@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    昆明理工大学人文社会科学研究培育项目(skpyyb201631)

Evaluation of the academic quality of papers in the process of initial review of papers based on literature database

ZHU Yinzhou   

  1. Editorial Department of Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology, 727 Jingming South Road, Kunming 650500, China
  • Received:2017-03-21 Revised:2017-05-16 Online:2017-07-15 Published:2017-07-15

摘要:

【目的】研究学术期刊编辑精选稿件流程,基于各类文献数据库查证来稿的学术创新性、作者及其团队的学术实力、学术研究环境,以及稿件文献列表的合理性,试图实证来稿学术的创新性,发现来稿中的学术不端行为等问题。【方法】除常规选稿流程之外,增加检索文献数据库以及比对流程,按照作者姓名、单位名称、来稿关键词分别检索得到不同的文献数据集合,与作者历史文献、作者单位文献、不同角度的同类文献集合进行比对。【结果】能够从作者稿件内容和作者相关信息角度证实稿件是否具有创新性,并发现稿件中深藏的学术不端等行为。【结论】在编辑精选稿件过程中,文献数据库在佐证稿件的创新性,发现稿件中隐匿的诸多问题等方面具有重要的价值。判断稿件的学术质量需要编辑和审稿专家共同努力,共同担负学术责任。

关键词: 编辑行为, 稿件初审, 期刊文献数据库, 学术创新, 学术不端行为

Abstract:

[Purposes] The study aims to explore paper selection procedure by academic journal editors, find out academic misconducts, and verify academic innovation of received papers based on academic integrity analysis, academic capabilities of the authors and their teams, academic environment, and references rationality through various document databases. [Methods] Besides routine selections, the retrieval and intercomparison process based on document databases were added. The papers were retrieved by author name, institution, key words respectively to obtain a set of archives from different databases which were then intercompared with the historical documents of authors and their institutions, and documents of the same type with different views. [Findings] The academic innovation and hidden misconduct can be verified by the content of the received papers and author informations. [Conclusions] Document databases are of high referential significance in the paper selection process by editors, such as proof of academic innovation, assistance of hidden academic misconduct. Through mutual effort of editors and reviewers, the paper qualities will be improved.

Key words: Editing, Initial evaluation, Academic journal database, Academic innovation, Academic misconduct