摘要： 目的 梳理我国现存学术期刊评价体系,探讨学术期刊评价体系发展趋势。方法 通过分析学术期刊评价体系的现状及存在问题,构建科学合理的学术期刊评价体系。结果 中国的学术期刊评价体系主要有基于“质量评估”的“合格评价”和“优秀期刊评价”以及基于“影响力大小”的核心期刊评价,两种评价体系均有一定的局限性。我国各评价机构应进行整合或合作,将倡导学术规范作为重要职责,建立统一规范的适合中国国情的学术期刊评价体系,不断完善评价指标体系和评价方法,在遴选评价指标时,要更加注重评价指标对期刊质量的引导作用。结论 只有各评价机构及管理部门深刻反思实际应用中存在的问题,才能真正构建科学合理的学术期刊评价体系。
[Purpose] The existing academic journa1s'eva1uation system is investigated thorough1y in order to exp1ore its deve1opment trend.[Methodology] By ana1yzing the status and prob1ems of academ ic journa1s'eva1uation system,a scientific and rationa1eva1uation system is bui1t.[Findings] There are two kinds of academic journa1sv eva1uation system in China.One is based on the“qua1ity assessment” of“qua1ified appraisa1” and “exce11ent journa1eva1uation”.The other is based on the“inf1uence” of core journa1s'eva1uation.These two eva1uation systems both have certain 1im itations.Rating agencies in China shou1d integrate and cooperate w ith each other, take advocating academ ic norms as an important responsibi1ity, in order to estab1ish a unified and normative academ ic journa1s'eva1uation system suitab1e for China's situation.And the eva1uation parameter system and methods shou1d be improved constant1y.In the se1ection of eva1uation parameters,its ro1e of guiding the qua1ity of journa1s shou1d be paid more attention to.[Conclusions] The prob1ems in practica1app1ications shou1d be rethought profound1y by various rating agencies and adm inistrations in order to bui1d a rea1scientific and rationa1eva1uation system of academ ic journa1s.
Academ ic journa1s,
Academ ic journa1eva1uation,
Academic eva1uation system