中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 839-844.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201903180182

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内外光学类英文科技论文立场表达的对比研究——以Optics ExpressChinese Optics Letters为例

周强1,)2),佟祉岳1),孙洪建3)   

  1. 1) 鲁东大学外国语学院,山东省烟台市芝罘区红旗中路186号 264025
    2) 山东大学外国语学院,山东省济南市历城区洪家楼5号 250100
    3) 山东警察学院外语教研部,山东省济南市历下区文化东路54号 250014
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-18 修回日期:2019-06-21 出版日期:2019-08-15 发布日期:2019-08-30
  • 作者简介:周 强(ORCID:0000-0002-0329-5962), 博士, 讲师,山东大学博士后,E-mail: cflzq@163.com|佟祉岳,硕士研究生|孙洪建,硕士,讲师
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金面上项目“‘习式话语’策略操控研究”(2018M632654);国家社会科学基金“对比修辞学视阈下的二语写作及其能力标准研究”(15BYY074)

A comparative study of stance markers in optical English scietific papers published at home and abroad:Taking Optics Express and Chinese Optics Letters as examples

ZHOU Qiang1,)2),TONG Zhiyue1),SUN Hongjian3)   

  1. 1) College of Foreign Languages, Ludong University, 186 Middle Hongqi Road, Zhifu District, Yantai 264025, China
    2) College of Foreign Languages, Shandong University, 5 Hongjialou, Licheng District, Jinan 250100, China
    3) Department of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, Shandong Police College, 54 East Wenhua Road, Lixia District, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2019-03-18 Revised:2019-06-21 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-08-30

摘要:

【目的】对比分析国内外光学类英文科技论文结论部分的立场表达标记语的使用特征,推动中国英文科技期刊的语言国际化进程,提升其国际影响力。【方法】选取国外光学类科技期刊Optics Express和中国英文光学类科技期刊Chinese Optics Letters作为语料来源,采用语料库软件AntiConc 3.3.5对60篇论文的结论部分进行检索和统计。【结果】国外学者使用不同类别的立场表达标记语,且较为均衡;国内学者使用的类别不全面,存在过度使用某一类与从不使用某些类别的现象;国内外学者所撰写的论文结论部分在模糊性、确定性、态度性、方式性标记语方面有显著差异。【结论】国内学者的立场表达与学术身份构建意识薄弱。作者应有意识地学习、了解立场表达标记语在学术语篇中的作用,增强立场表达意识;编辑应帮助作者平衡立场表达标记语的使用。

关键词: 立场表达标记语, 英文科技论文, 光学

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to explore the features of stance markers in the conclusion section of optical English scientific papers published at home and abroad, so as to promote the language internationalization of China-sponsored English scientific journals and enhance their international influence. [Methods] The foreign journal Optics Express and the Chinese journal Chinese Optics Letters were selected as sample data. The corpus software AntiConc 3.3.5 was used to retrieve and count the conclusions of 60 papers. [Findings] English-speaking scholars from Optics Express employ stance markers in a comprehensive and balanced manner. Chinese scholars from Chinese Optics Letters employ stance markers in an incomplete and unbalanced manner, either overusing one marker or never using others. There are significant differences in the dimensions of hedges, boosters, attitude, and stylistic markers among Chinese and English-speaking scholars. [Conclusions] Chinese scholars are not fully aware of the importance of constructing stance and identity. The authors should learn and fully understand the role that stance markers play in academic discourse, so as to raise their awareness to construct stance. In addition, the editors should help the authors to balance the use of stance markers.

Key words: Stance marker, English scientific paper, Optics