中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 399-404.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201412011153

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文期刊零被引率与期刊关键评价指标相关性分析——以图书情报学科为例

李美玉,王硕,郑德俊   

  1. 南京农业大学信息管理系,江苏省南京市玄武区卫岗1号 210095
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-01 修回日期:2015-01-19 出版日期:2015-04-15 发布日期:2015-04-15
  • 作者简介:李美玉(ORCID:0000-0002-5533-3983),硕士研究生,E-mail: 2013114013@njau.edu.cn

Correlation analysis between non-cited rates and key evaluation indicators in Chinese periodicals:case study in library and information science

LIM eiyu,WANG Shuo,ZHENG Dejun   

  1. Information Management Department,Nanjing Agricultural University,1 Weigang,Xuanwu District,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210095,China
  • Received:2014-12-01 Revised:2015-01-19 Online:2015-04-15 Published:2015-04-15

摘要: 目的 探讨期刊零被引率与期刊关键评价指标的相关关系,检验期刊零被引率作为期刊评价反向指标的科学性。 方法 以CSSCI为数据源,选择图书情报学科核心期刊作为研究对象,计算时间窗口分别为2-5年的期刊零被引率、期刊关键评价指标,借助于SPSS分析期刊零被引率与期刊评价指标间的相关关系。结果 期刊零被引率与期刊关键评价指标(2年影响因子、5年影响因子和h指数)显著负相关,期刊自引对于期刊的引用突破并不构成重要影响。结论 期刊零被引率可以作为一个反向指标,但需要考虑学科差异性。

关键词: 零被引, 期刊评价, 评价指标

Abstract:

[Purpose] This paper explores the correlation between non-cited rates and key journal evaluation indicators,and exam ines the scientificity of using the non-cited rates as a negative indicator in journal evaluation.[Methodology] Based on CSSCI,taking the Chinese core journals in library and information science discipline as an example,this article calculates the 2-5 years noncited rates and key journal evaluation indicators,then conducts a correlation analysis between them via SPSS.[Findings] There is a significant negative correlation between non-cited rates and key evaluation indicators(such as 2-year impact factor,5-year impact factor,h-index),and the journal self-citation does not have an important influence on journal citation.[Conclusions] The non-cited rates can be used as a negative indicator for journal evaluation,but the disciplinary differences should be considered.

Key words: Non-cited rates, Journal evaluation, Evaluation indicator