中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 956-961.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201904030226

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

审稿人工作量的影响因素研究——基于对Publons Top Reviewers个体特征的实证分析

黄颖1),吴其达2),宗乾进2)(),张燕霏2),徐英朔2),程媛1)   

  1. 1)华南师范大学法学院,广东省广州市外环路378号 510006
    2)华南师范大学经济与管理学院,广东省广州市外环路378号 510006
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-03 修回日期:2019-07-12 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 宗乾进 E-mail:zongqj@m.scnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:黄 颖(ORCID:0000-0001-7796-3719),本科生,E-mail: daisy@m.scnu.edu.cn|吴其达,本科生|张燕霏,助理研究员|徐英朔,本科生程 媛,本科生。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省2019年省级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S201910574096);华南师范大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(20191515)

Influence factors of workloads of reviewers: An empirical study on individual characteristics of Publons Top Reviewers

HUANG Ying1),WU Qida2),ZONG Qianjin2)(),ZHANG Yanfei2),XU Yingshuo2),CHENG Yuan1)   

  1. 1)School of Law, South China Normal University, 378 Waihuan Road, Guangzhou 510006, China
    2)School of Economics and Management, South China Normal University, 378 Waihuan Road, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2019-04-03 Revised:2019-07-12 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-09-15
  • Contact: ZONG Qianjin E-mail:zongqj@m.scnu.edu.cn

摘要:

【目的】 探讨影响审稿人工作量的主要因素,为科技期刊遴选审稿人提供参考。【方法】 从Publons平台中获取2018年Top审稿人的审稿行为数据,提取出基于审稿人个体特征的指标,并采用探索性因子分析法抽取出公共因子。【结果】 审稿人工作量的主要影响因素是审稿人的学术产出、学术影响力、学术兼职和研究资历。【结论】 科技期刊除了重视邀请资深科学家审稿外,还应特别重视向年轻科学家发出审稿邀请。

关键词: 审稿人, 工作量, 同行评议, 科技期刊, Publons

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to provide suggestions for scientific journals in selecting peer reviewers by exploring the main factors influencing the workloads of reviewers. [Methods] Peer reviewers' behavioral data were obtained from the webpage of 2018 Publons Top Reviewers, and the indicators of individual characteristics of Publons Top Reviewers were constructed. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to extract the main factors. [Findings] The results show that four main factors have impacts on the workloads of reviewers, which are the reviewer's academic output, academic impact, academic part-time jobs, and academic qualifications. [Conclusions] It is important for scientific journals to invite senior scientists, as well as young scientists for peer review.

Key words: Reviewer, Workload, Peer review, Scientific journal, Publons