中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 585-591.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201712101019

• 数字出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

科研人员选择巨型OA期刊发文的影响因素分析——以PLoS ONE为例

陈秀娟1,2),郭进京3)()   

  1. 1)中国科学院成都文献情报中心,四川省成都市武侯区一环路南二段16号 610041
    2)中国科学院大学,北京市石景山区玉泉路19号(甲) 100049
    3)中国医学科学院医学信息研究所/图书馆,北京市东城区东单北大街69号 100005
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-10 修回日期:2018-03-31 出版日期:2018-06-15 发布日期:2018-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭进京 E-mail:guo.jinjing@imicams.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:陈秀娟(ORCID:0000-0002-8063-7647),博士研究生,E-mail: chenxiujuan@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技图书文献中心专项“开放资源数据采集与加工”(NSTLXM21)

Analysis on factors of researchers' choice with open access mega-journals: Taking PLoS ONE as an example

CHEN Xiujuan1,2),GUO Jinjing3)()   

  1. 1)Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 South Section 2, Yihuan Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu 610041, China
    2)University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19(A) Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China
    3)Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 69 North Dongdan Main Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2017-12-10 Revised:2018-03-31 Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-06-15
  • Contact: GUO Jinjing E-mail:guo.jinjing@imicams.ac.cn

摘要:

【目的】了解影响科研人员选择巨型开放获取期刊投稿的关键因素,为未来国内巨型开放获取期刊发展和吸引科研人员投稿提供借鉴。【方法】以2016年在PLoS ONE上发文的作者为问卷调查对象,构建影响科研人员选择巨型开放获取期刊发文的因素评价量表,利用SPSS软件进行因子分析,找出并分析关键影响因素。【结果】巨型开放获取期刊的质量、声誉、评审和出版速度是影响作者选择的最关键因素。【结论】期刊出版商应通过采用开放同行评议和社群评估来保证刊发论文质量;通过缩短论文评审和出版周期来吸引作者投稿;通过扩展期刊学科覆盖领域来增加期刊受众面;设置合理的文章处理费收费标准,打击欺诈性巨型开放获取期刊。

关键词: 巨型开放获取期刊, PLoS ONE, 开放出版, 因子分析

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to understand key influencing factors of researchers' choice with open access mega-journals and provide references for publishing industry. [Methods] Taking the authors who published articles on the PLoS ONE in 2016 as respondents, we took the method of network questionnaire and constructed evaluation scale of factors which influenced researchers on choosing open access mega-journals. The key influencing factors were analyzed by factor analysis with SPSS software. [Findings] The quality, reputation, review, and publishing speed of journals are important factors that affected authors' choice. [Conclusions] Publishers should try to use open peer review and community assessment to ensure the quality of papers and enhance the influence of journals. They should expand the journals' broad and shorten the review and publication period to attract authors' submission, and set reasonable APC and crack down on fraudulent open access journals.

Key words: Open access mega-journal, PLoS ONE, Open publishing, Factor analysis