中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 69-74. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201707190600

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国SCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率的国际比较

盛丽娜1,)2)   

  1. 1) 新乡医学院期刊社《眼科新进展》编辑部,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003 2) 河南省科技期刊研究中心,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-19 修回日期:2017-09-18 出版日期:2018-01-15 发布日期:2018-01-15
  • 作者简介:盛丽娜(ORCID:0000-0003-1359-4074),硕士,副编审,E-mail: 379270442@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目“我国人文社会科学研究国际影响力现状分析”(2018-ZZJH-420);新乡医学院科技期刊与科研绩效评价研究培育基地项目

Comparison between self-cited rate in correlation with impact factor of SCI journals from China and other countries

SHENG Lina1,)2)   

  1. 1) Editorial Office of Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, Xinxiang Medical University, 601 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang 453003, China 2) Henan Research Center for Scie.pngic Journals, 601 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang 453003, China
  • Received:2017-07-19 Revised:2017-09-18 Online:2018-01-15 Published:2018-01-15

摘要:

【目的】 分析我国SCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率(SCR-IF)的状况,进一步解读自引在影响因子中的作用,以利于我国办刊人掌握期刊的发展方向。【方法】 以2015年版SCI收录期刊为研究对象,计算中国和G7国家(美国、英国、德国、法国、日本、意大利、加拿大)、有代表性的新兴国家(韩国、印度、俄罗斯)期刊自被引率(SCR),同时计算各刊的SCR-IF、非影响因子相关自被引率(SCR-NIF)及二者比值K,对各国期刊的SCR-IF、SCR-NIF、SCR、K值情况进行对比分析。【结果】 各国期刊SCR-IF的均值均大于SCR-NIF和SCR,K的中位值为1.502~1.889;我国SCI收录期刊的SCR-IF、SCR-NIF均小于韩国和俄罗斯,但高于其他8个国家;我国SCI收录期刊中,SCR-IF为0的期刊占比为3.28%,小于各国均值6.21%;我国K>2.0的期刊占比为34.97%,小于各国均值37.19%。【结论】 SCR-IF较SCR更能准确反映期刊自引对影响因子的实际作用。我国SCI收录期刊SCR-IF相对较高,但仍有部分期刊的自引对影响因子没有任何作用,且我国SCI收录期刊的自引较少有人为操控。

关键词: 影响因子相关自被引率, 非影响因子相关自被引率, 期刊评价, 学术期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to analyze the status quo of self-cited rate in correlation with impact factor (SCR-IF) of Chinese journals indexed in SCI database, and further interpret the role of self-citation in the impact factors to provide references for scie.pngic journals to master journal development directions. [Methods] Taking the SCI journals in 2015 as examples, the SCR-IF, self-cited rate in non-correlation with impact factor (SCR-NIF), total self-cited rate (SCR) and the ratio K of SCR-IF to SCR-NIF from China, G7 countries (United States, Britain, Germany, France, Japan, Italy, Canada), Korea, India, and Russia were calculated. [Findings] The mean values of SCR-IF are higher than those of SCR-NIF and SCR. The median of K value ranges from 1.502 to 1.889. The SCR-IF and SCR-NIF of China are lower than those of Korea and Russia, but higher than those of other eight countries. The proportion of journals with SCR-IF of 0 is 3.28%, which is less than the average of 6.21%. The journal proportion of K>2.0 in China is 34.97%, which is less than the average of 37.19%. [Conclusions] SCR-IF can reflect the practical effect of self-cited rate on impact factor. Although the SCR-IF is relatively high, the self-citations of some journals have no effects on the impact factor. The self-citations are less man-controlled in Chinese SCI journals.

Key words: Self-cited rate in correlation with impact factor, Self-cited rate in non-correlation with impact factor, Journal evaluation, Academic journal