Abstract:

Purposes It explains the role of each stage of the academic journal manuscript processing in cultivating the academic abilities of authors， providing a reference for academic journals to facilitate the growth of authors. Methods From the perspective of editorial practice， an academic ability framework consisting of five dimensions-problem discovery， scheme design， paper writing， academic communication， and academic ethics-was constructed. By combining theoretical analysis with case evidence， the intrinsic association mechanism between the entire process of manuscript processing and academic ability cultivation was analyzed. Findings The initial review stage can enhance the author’s ability in writing papers and their awareness of academic ethical norms； the external review stage， through experts’ quality control of the content， improves the author’s ability to identify problems and design research plans； the revision stage， through two-way interaction， sharpens the author’s academic communication and paper-writing skills； the final review and appeal stages can cultivate the author’s academic perspective and the ability to debate based on evidence； the editing and proofreading stage can promote the author to internalize academic rigor in their work. Conclusions While maintaining the core focus on academic quality， the standardized and structured manuscript processing system of scientific journals can help cultivate the academic abilities of authors.

Key words: Academic journal, Manuscript processing, Author, Academic ability, Editorial practice

摘要：

目的 阐释了学术期刊稿件处理各环节对作者学术能力的培养作用，为学术期刊助力作者成长提供参考。 方法 基于编辑实践视角，构建了包含问题发现、方案设计、论文撰写、学术沟通、学术道德5个维度的学术能力框架，采用理论分析与案例佐证相结合的方法，解析稿件处理全流程与学术能力培养的内在关联机制。 结果 初审环节可以强化作者的论文撰写能力和学术道德规范意识；外审环节通过专家对内容的质量把关，提升作者发现问题、设计科研方案等能力；修稿环节通过双向互动，锤炼作者的学术沟通、论文撰写能力；终审和申诉环节可以培育作者的学术格局和基于证据的辩论能力；编辑加工和校对环节可以推动作者将学术严谨性内化于心。 结论 学术期刊在坚守学术质量核心定位的同时，其标准化、结构化的稿件处理体系可以实现对作者学术能力的培养。

关键词: 学术期刊, 稿件处理流程, 作者, 学术能力, 编辑实践