Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 109-120. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202512031517

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Empirical study on the digital and intelligent literacy of academic journal editors facing new quality productivity, basic principles and cultivation pathways

YAO Renbin1()(), LIU Chang1, LIU Lu1, ZHOU Yang1, LU Yuqing1, HE Li2),*()()   

  1. 1)Editorial Department of Journal of Bengbu Medical University,2600 Donghai Avenue,Longzihu District,Bengbu 233030,China
    2)Editorial Department of Journal of Anhui University of Technology,400 Hudong Road,Huashan District,Ma’anshan 243002,China
  • Received:2025-12-03 Revised:2026-01-14 Online:2026-01-25 Published:2026-03-09
  • Contact: HE Li

面向新质生产力的学术期刊编辑数智化素养实证研究、基本遵循与培育路径

姚仁斌1()(), 刘畅1, 刘璐1, 周洋1, 卢玉清1, 何莉2),*()()   

  1. 1)《蚌埠医科大学学报》编辑部,安徽省蚌埠市龙子湖区东海大道2600号 233030
    2)《安徽工业大学学报》编辑部,安徽省马鞍山市花山区湖东路400号 243002
  • 通讯作者: 何莉
  • 作者简介:

    姚仁斌(ORCID: 0000-0002-1577-0695),硕士,编审,E-mail:

    刘 畅,硕士,副编审;

    刘 璐,硕士,副编审;

    周 洋,硕士,编辑;

    卢玉清,硕士,编辑。

    作者贡献声明: 姚仁斌:论文框架设计,实施研究过程,撰写和修改论文; 刘 畅:制作调查表,修改论文; 刘 璐,周 洋:收集资料,数据整理; 卢玉清:汇总调查表,分析统计; 何 莉:提供研究思路,审核论文。
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高校省级质量工程项目(2024jcjs130); 安徽省高等学校哲学社会科学重点研究项目“基于学科协同发展的地方医学高等院校智库构建路径及对策研究”(2023AH051894)

Abstract:

Purposes To investigate the current situation of the digital and intelligent literacy among academic journal editors in the context of new quality productivity and construct cultivation pathways to empower the high-quality development of academic journals. Methods Based on preliminary research, an online questionnaire was developed to assess the editors’ digital-intelligent literacy. We distributed online questionnaires via We Chat and QQ groups to 348 editors using WJX (an online platform for questionnaire design and data collection). Empirical analysis was conducted based on the data from the questionnaire survey. Findings The survey revealed that digital and intelligent tools are commonly used by academic journal editors (68.1%). Editors demonstrated proficiency in basic skills such as academic database utilization (91.4%), social media promotion (62.1%), and AI-assisted peer review (85.3%). However, the applications in fields such as data visualization analysis, digital layout, and data mining of journal impact were relatively insufficient. Significant differences were found in digital editing competency scores among editors with varying educational backgrounds, professional titles, and familiarity with digital tools (P<0.01). Most editors identified the lack of systematic training as the primary obstacle to applying digital and intelligent tools (77.6%), with training demands highly concentrated on practical skills like AI-assisted peer review (85.3%), and data analysis and visualization (76.7%). Conclusions Based on the empirical analysis, the study proposes three basic principles: internal-external collaboration, integration of theory and practice, and precise identification. It constructs a framework for cultivating digital and intelligent literacy among academic journal editors, involving a collaboration among individual editors, editorial offices, and industry associations. This framework covers the overall process of internal motivation activation, learning planning, institutional safeguards, practical empowerment, standard guidance, and platform support.

Key words: Digital-intelligent literacy, Journal editors, Empirical survey, Digital- intelligent editorial competence, Training needs

摘要:

目的 了解新质生产力背景下,学术期刊编辑数智化素养的现状,并构建培育路径,赋能学术期刊高质量发展。 方法 在预调研的基础上,编制学术期刊编辑数智化素养调研问卷,通过编辑微信群、QQ群等线上渠道对348名编辑发放问卷星电子问卷,针对问卷结果展开实证分析。 结果 调研结果显示,数智化工具是期刊编辑的常规使用工具(68.1%);编辑在学术数据库(91.4%)、社交媒体推广(62.1%)和AI辅助审稿(85.3%)等基础技能的使用上较为熟练,但在数据可视化分析、数字化排版、期刊影响力数据挖掘等领域相对使用不足。不同学历、职称的编辑群体数智编辑力得分有差异(P<0.01);多数编辑认为应用数智化工具的主要困难是缺乏系统性培训(77.6%),培训需求高度集中于AI审稿(85.3%)、数据分析与可视化技能(76.7%)等实用技能。 结论 基于实证研究分析,确立了内外因协同、理论实践结合和精准识别3项基本遵循,构建由编辑个体-编辑部-国家/行业学会三方联合协同推进、贯穿 “内驱激活-学习规划-制度保障-实践赋能-标准引领-平台支撑” 全过程的学术期刊编辑数智化素养培育路径框架。

关键词: 数智化素养, 期刊编辑, 实证调查, 数智编辑力, 培训需求