Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 167-171. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202207140538

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Appellation divergence in citation format of data items and the grounds for scientific denomination

ZHAO Shuqing1)()(), LIU Yongsheng2)   

  1. 1) Journal Center of Taiyuan University of Technology, 79 West Yingze Street, Taiyuan 030024, China
    2) Archives of Taiyuan University of Technology, 79 West Yingze Street, Taiyuan 030024, China
  • Received:2022-07-14 Revised:2022-12-03 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-03-20

引用格式数据项称谓分歧及其科学定名理据

赵树庆1)()(), 刘永胜2)   

  1. 1) 太原理工大学期刊中心,山西省太原市迎泽西大街79号 030024
    2) 太原理工大学档案馆,山西省太原市迎泽西大街79号 030024
  • 作者简介:

    赵树庆(ORCID:0000-0003-1840-8170),硕士,副编审,E-mail:;

    刘永胜,学士,研究馆员。

    作者贡献声明: 赵树庆:提出研究选题,拟定论文框架,撰写论文初稿; 刘永胜:提供参考资料,修改论文。
  • 基金资助:
    山西省期刊协会高校期刊委员会编辑学研究项目“学术期刊数据标识项歧义问题研究”(XB202230)

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to eliminate divergence and unify appellation by analyzing the harms and causes of the appellation divergence in citation format of data items and exploring logical specifications and scientific basis for academic denomination. [Methods] The literature survey method was used to sort out the types and quantities of citation format of data items. Based on the principles of terminology denomination and general principles of formal logic about concept and definition, combined with word-formation norms in modern Chinese, this paper gave the scientific definition of the concept of citation format and comparatively analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of existing diverse appellations. [Findings] Each of the existing 9 appellations has its advantages and disadvantages. Comparatively speaking, "citation format" and "quotation format" are more rational. [Conclusions] "Citation format" can be used as the proper name for citation format of data items, and "quotation format" can be used as an alternate name.

Key words: Reference, Referencing norm, Citation format, Quotation format, Academic denomination

摘要:

【目的】 分析引用格式数据项称谓分歧现象的危害和成因,寻找学术命名的逻辑规范和科学依据,以期消除分歧,统一称谓。【方法】 利用文献调查法,梳理并甄别引用格式数据项称谓的种类和数量;依据术语学定名原则和形式逻辑中关于概念与定义的一般原理,结合现代汉语构词规范,给出引用格式概念的科学定义并对现存各种称谓的利弊予以对比分析。【结果】 现有的9种称谓各有优势和不足。相对而言,“引用格式”和“引文格式”2个术语的合理性更加突出。【结论】 “引用格式”为引用格式数据项的正名,“引文格式”可作为又称使用。

关键词: 参考文献, 著录规范, 引用格式, 引文格式, 学术命名