Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 842-848. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201803200244

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of rationality on the ranking of academic journal clout index

HONG Hanmei,CHEN Yan,QIAN Xinping,QI Jianqin   

  1. Journal Publishing Center of Zhejiang University Press, 148 Tianmushan Road, Hangzhou 310007, China
  • Received:2018-03-20 Revised:2018-05-25 Online:2018-08-15 Published:2018-08-15

期刊影响力指数排名的合理性分析

洪寒梅,陈妍,钱欣平,祁建琴   

  1. 浙江大学出版社期刊中心,浙江省杭州市天目山路148号 310007
  • 作者简介:洪寒梅(ORCID:0000-0003-2391-3569),硕士,编辑,E-mail:honghm@zju.edu.cn|陈 妍,硕士,编辑|钱欣平,博士,副编审,执行主编|祁建琴,学士,编辑。

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to explore scientific rationality and possible inadequacies of academic journal clout index (CI) to help decision-makers, publishers, and authors to evaluate the influence of academic journals and predict the development potential of journals. [Methods] Taking the data of ten journals' indexes from Annual Report for Chinese Academic Journal Impact factors (Natural Science) (2015-2017) as objects, we ranked the journals according to every journal's comprehensive principal component score (F) by principal component analysis in IBM SPSS software. Results of F-ranking and CI-ranking were compared and the differences were analyzed. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was applied to compare the correlation between fCI and F with each of the ten journals' indexes. [Findings] The F has closer correlation with the ten journals' indexes than those with fCI. Immediacy index has lower correlation coefficient with both F and fCI than the other indexes, while the correlation coefficient with F is higher than that with fCI. [Conclusions] The F can better represent the ten journals' indexes than fCI. Thus F-ranking is much closer to the level of journals reflected by all ten journals' indexes. F-ranking has advantage of fCI-ranking to show journals' reaction rate and citation intensity, and to indicate journals' latest development trend and vitality. Immediacy index of journals should be considered when the CI-ranking is consulted.

Key words: Academic journal, Influence ranking, Journal clout index, Principal component analysis, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, Immediacy index, Citation intensity

摘要:

【目的】 探讨期刊影响力指数的科学合理性及其可能存在的不足,以利于决策者、办刊人以及作者更加科学地评估学术期刊影响力,预测期刊发展潜力。【方法】 以2015—2017年《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》的10个期刊指标数据为研究对象,运用IBM SPSS软件,采用主成分分析法,求得各期刊的综合主成分得分(F),按照F对期刊进行排名;将F与期刊影响力指数(fCI)排名结果进行对比分析;采用Spearman秩相关系数,比较fCIF与10个指标的相关程度。【结果】 F与10个指标的相关性总体高于fCI;fCIF与即年指标的相关系数相对较小,但是F明显高于fCI【结论】 F排名更接近各项指标共同表征的期刊水平;更能反映期刊的反应速率和被引强度;在参阅期刊fCI排名时,应当特别注意参考期刊的即年指标。

关键词: 学术期刊, 影响力排名, 期刊影响力指数, 主成分分析, Spearman秩相关系数, 即年指标, 被引强度