目的 研究国际知名高校出版社对基本科学指标(Essential Science Indicators, ESI)学科的贡献度。方法 利用ESI和InCites数据库,采用文献计量学方法研究2007—2017年英国剑桥大学出版社和牛津大学出版社下属期刊对ESI学科的贡献度。结果 国际知名高校出版社下属SCI收录期刊对ESI学科的累计贡献度较高,且累计被引贡献度和发文贡献度的差距较小,一些老牌SCI收录期刊的贡献尤为明显;但部分顶尖学科领域存在优质稿件外流现象。结论 国际知名高校出版社的期刊发展与学科建设的互促模式发展成熟,充分利用高校学科发展的带动优势,成功培育一批竞争力较强的科技期刊。我国高校期刊应抓住“双一流”发展机遇,加强与专家学者联系,打造品牌,形成期刊与学科同步发展的格局。
[Purposes] This paper aims to study the contributions of distinguished international university press to the development of their Essential Science Indicators (ESI) disciplines.[Methods] Bibliometrics analysis was performed by using the databases of ESI and InCites to explore the contributions of journals sponsored by Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press to their corresponding ESI disciplines. [Findings] The SCI journals, especially several classical journals sponsored by distinguished international university press, contribute to a large part of the publications and citations in their corresponding ESI disciplines. Moreover, there is a small gap between the accumulative contribution degree of publications and citations. However, they failed to attract and publish superior works at some top-level disciplines. [Conclusions] The mutual promotion mode between journal development and discipline construction of international well-known university press is mature, which makes full use of the advantages of university discipline development and cultivates a batch of competitive scientific journals. Chinese university journals should strengthen the connection with scholars and build brand by seizing the chance of double first-class development, and facilitate the mutual development of journals and disciplines.
International well-known university press,
Double first-class construction