中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 691-697. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201803270264

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术不端论文未被撤销现象及其治理——基于董鹏学术不端事件的个案分析

杨珠   

  1. 《泉州师范学院学报》编辑部,福建省泉州市丰泽区东海大街398号 362000
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-27 修回日期:2018-05-24 出版日期:2018-07-15 发布日期:2018-07-15
  • 作者简介:杨 珠(ORCID:0000-0003-3958-398X),硕士,副编审,E-mail:yangzhu@qztc.edu.cn。

Phenomenon on unretracted papers of academic misconduct and the corresponding treatment: Based on Dong Peng's academic misconduct

YANG Zhu   

  1. Editorial Office of Journal of Quanzhou Normal University, 398 Donghai Street, Fengze District, Quanzhou 362000, China
  • Received:2018-03-27 Revised:2018-05-24 Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-15

摘要:

【目的】 以董鹏学术不端事件为个案,分析相关期刊在发现该学术不端后对其论文撤销的情况,以期为我国学术期刊的撤销论文规范提供参考。【方法】 以新闻报道中董鹏发表的论文为样本,对相关期刊撤销其学术不端论文后,中国知网中还剩下的论文及相应的撤销声明进行检索,分析相关期刊撤销论文的行为。【结果】 董鹏学术不端事件于2016年被报道,截至2018年1月2日,其66.02%的论文仍原样保留在中国知网中,0.12%的论文被相关期刊从数据库中撤销并刊登了撤销声明,33.86%的论文被相关期刊从数据库直接撤销。【结论】 受我国目前暂无完善的撤销论文制度及撤销论文意识不强等因素影响,学术不端论文未撤销和撤销论文未刊登撤销声明的现象较为严重,需要政府与学术团体、作者机构、数据库机构、期刊、读者和作者采取适当措施,共同净化我国学术环境。

关键词: 学术期刊, 撤销论文, 董鹏事件, 学术不端

Abstract:

[Purposes] Taking Dong Peng's academic misconduct as a case, the paper analyzes the status of retractions in the relevant journals after finding the academic misconduct, so as to provide references for the retractions of academic journals in Chinese academic journals. [Methods] Taking the papers written by Dong Peng in news reports as samples, we researched the remaining papers and corresponding retractions statements in CNKI after the related journals retracted papers of academic misconduct. And the behavior of retractions of academic journals is analyzed. [Findings] After Dong Peng's academic misconduct was reported in 2016, as of January 2, 2018, 66.02% of the papers written by Dong Peng were retained in CNKI, 0.12% of these papers were retracted and issued a retractions statements, and 33.86% of these papers were retracted directly from the database by the related journals. [Conclusions] Influenced by the factors of the absence of perfect retraction mechanism in China and the lack of retraction consciousness, the phenomenon of unretracted papers with academic misconduct or retracted without notice is serious. It is necessary for the government and academic organizations, authors' institutions, database institutions, journals, readers, and authors to take appropriate measures to jointly purify the academic environment.

Key words: Academic journal, Retracted paper, Dong Peng's event, Academic misconduct