[Purposes]This paper aims to study the current situation of university journals（medical science） abstracts and provide a reference for regulating sci-tech journals abstracts and improve the quality of the journal.[Methods]By the literaturemethod and the comparative analysis, the seven university journals（medical science） included in CSCD were regarded as the investigation object, and the author analyzed the condition of Chinese abstracts in the final two papers, 2015.[Findings]The seven university journalsmainly adopted four-heading structured abstract, but abstract structures of the same theme were sometimes different;numbers of words were also far from the notice to contributors w ith a great difference ranging from 100 words to 900 words;structured abstracts usually used no first-person pronounswhile non-structured abstracts tended to usemore first-person pronouns;the information content of abstracts was higher;the information content of the structured abstract was higher than that of the nonstructured abstract.[Conclusions]Standards and rules for abstracts should be revised as soon as possible.Research for standardization of sci-tech journals abstracts should be actively carried out.It is necessary to improve authors'and editors'consciousness of quality and standardization in an effort to create high quality sci-tech journals.
Currentw riting situation,
University journals（medical sciences）,