摘要：

目的 探讨2015—2024年我国社会科学论文外流的动态变化，为减少我国社会科学论文的外流及制定改进策略提供数据参考。 方法 利用InCites数据库，收集并计算不同国家和地区社会科学论文的外流率，统计我国社会科学论文外流的主要国家和地区分布，比较我国（不含港澳台地区）31个省级行政区社会科学论文外流数量及外流率。 结果 2015—2024年，中国社会科学论文外流呈持续上升趋势，与其他国家和地区相比，中国社会科学论文外流数量较高，且外流率位居第1；中国社会科学论文外流流向相对集中，主要流向英格兰、美国、瑞士和荷兰，占比约为90%。从我国（不含港澳台地区）不同省级行政区社会科学论文外流量来看，北京、上海、广东位居前3位，江苏、浙江、湖北、四川、山东的社会科学论文外流量紧随其后。 结论 与全球其他国家和地区相比，2015—2024年，我国社会科学论文外流率较高。今后，国家应积极构建有国际影响力社会科学期刊体系，鼓励我国社会科学学者在国内社会科学期刊发表学术成果，进一步提升我国社会科学期刊学术影响力和国际话语权。

关键词: 学术论文外流, SSCI期刊, 社会科学论文, 国际对比

Abstract:

Purposes To probe into the dynamic changes in the outflow of Chinese social science papers between 2015 and 2024 and to provide an international comparison， with the aim of offering empirical evidence to help reduce the outflow of such papers and formulate strategies for improvement. Methods Using the InCites database， the outflow rates of social science papers from different countries and regions were collected and calculated. The distribution of outflow destinations for Chinese social science papers， along with the volume and outflow rates from the 31 provincial-level administrative regions in China（not induding Hong Kong，Taiwan and Macao）， were statistically analysed. Findings Between 2015 and 2024， China’s outflow of social science papers has shown a persistent upward trend. While not the highest in absolute volume compared to other nations， China ranks first in outflow rate. The destinations for China’s social science papers are relatively concentrated， primarily in England， the United States， Switzerland， and the Netherlands. Domestically， Beijing， Shanghai， and Guangdong lead in distribution， followed closely by Jiangsu， Zhejiang， Hubei， Sichuan， and Shandong in terms of comprehensive social science paper output. Conclusions Compared with other countries and regions worldwide， China’s rate of outflow of social science papers was relatively high between 2015 and 2024. Going forward， the state should actively establish a system of social science journals with international influence， encourage social science scholars to publish their academic work in domestic social science journals， and further enhance China’s academic influence and international voice in the social sciences.

Key words: Academic paper outflow, SSCI journals, Social science papers, International comparison