提高期刊出版质量，推动期刊高质量发展，科学准确地传播优秀科研成果，从源头上杜绝量和单位不规范使用问题，强化期刊编辑和作者按照国家标准要求规范使用量和单位的意识。

在系统梳理2013—2023年个人审读36种期刊的审读意见表和审读记录表、汇总2023年集中审读的193种期刊的审读意见的基础上，采用文献调研、研习国家标准和规范、定量计算期刊占比等方式，结合期刊特点，对审读中发现的量和单位不规范使用指标进行分类，结合国家标准的相关规定指出审读中发现的问题并给出修改案例。

依据国家标准和规范及指标分类原则，将量和单位不规范使用指标分为5个一级指标、10个二级指标和40个三级指标；个人审读的36种期刊中，量和单位不规范使用期刊占比约为94.4%；集中审读的193种期刊中，量和单位不规范使用期刊占比约为57.0%；在10个二级指标中，出现问题较多的3个指标为量符号不规范、单位符号不规范、数值和单位书写格式不规范；梳理审读中常见的量和单位不规范使用问题并给出修改案例，总结正确使用量和单位的重要意义，提出加强量和单位规范化建设的建议。

期刊编辑、作者应认真贯彻执行量和单位系列国家标准，期刊编辑部可在自有网站显著位置或微信公众号平台列出有关量和单位规范使用的要求并加强量和单位规范使用的智能化、平台化建设。正确使用量和单位不仅有利于科学、准确地描述科研成果，也有利于科研成果的广泛传播，进一步加强科研成果的有效交流，从而促进科技期刊高质量发展。

This study aims to improve the quality of journal publishing, promote the high-quality development of journals, scientifically and accurately disseminate excellent scientific research results, eliminate the problem of non-standard use of quantities and units at the source, and strengthen the awareness of journal editors and authors to standardize the use of quantities and units in accordance with national standards.

Based on a systematic review of the review opinions and records of 36 journals reviewed by individuals from 2013 to 2023, and a summary of the review opinions of 193 journals reviewed in 2023, we adopted methods such as literature research to study national standards and norms, and quantitative calculation of journal proportions. Combined with the characteristics of journals, the indicators of non-standard use of quantities and units discovered during the review were classified. We also pointed out the issues identified during the review process in accordance with relevant national standards and provided revision cases.

According to national standards, norms, and indicator classification principles, the indicators for non-standard use of quantities and units are divided into 5 primary indicators, 10?secondary indicators, and 40 tertiary indicators. Among the 36 journals reviewed by individuals, approximately 94.4% exhibit non-standard use of quantities and units, while in the 193 journals reviewed in a centralized manner, approximately 57.0% show similar issues. Among the 10?secondary indicators, the 3?most problematic ones are non-standard quantity symbols, non-standard unit symbols, and non-standard numerical and unit writing formats. Based on the review findings, revision cases of non-standard use of quantities and units are provided, highlighting the importance of improving the quality of editing in terms of quantities and units and proposing suggestions to strengthen the standardization of quantities and units.

Journal editors and authors should conscientiously implement the national standards for quantities and units. Editorial departments can list the requirements for standardized use of quantities and units in prominent positions on their websites or their WeChat official account platforms, and strengthen the intelligent and platform-based management of the standardized use of quantities and units. The correct use of quantities and units is not only beneficial for accurately describing and disseminating scientific research achievements, but also promotes the effective communication of research findings, further enhancing the high-quality development of scientific journals.