中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 678-684.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201812101079

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊同行评议现状调查与分析——基于国内药学领域审稿专家群和作者群

储冀汝,李娟(),钟正灵   

  1. 皖南医学院第一附属医院《中国临床药理学与治疗学》编辑部,安徽省芜湖市镜湖区赭山西路2号 241000
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-10 修回日期:2019-02-26 出版日期:2019-06-15 发布日期:2019-07-02
  • 作者简介:储冀汝(ORCID:0000-0002-3753-1206),硕士,编辑,E-mail: cjr@cjcpt.com|钟正灵,硕士,编辑

Investigation and analysis of peer review status of scie.pngic journals: Based on reviewers and authors in Chinese pharmaceutical field

CHU Jiru,LI Juan(),ZHONG Zhengling   

  1. Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, 2 West Zheshan Road, Jinghu District, Wuhu 241000, China
  • Received:2018-12-10 Revised:2019-02-26 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-07-02

摘要: 目的 基于国内药学领域审稿专家群和作者群,调研科技期刊同行评议的现状,以探寻同行评议的优化策略。方法 发放针对审稿专家和作者的调查问卷,问卷主要包括同行评议流程、审稿意愿、同行评议形式、审稿意见反馈等内容。结果 对同行评议形式、稿件评价标准、审稿意见反馈等方面的调研结果进行分析与总结。对审稿专家群和作者群的同行评议观点的一致性和差异性进行阐述与剖析。结论 根据调研结果,提出加强初审筛选力度,有的放矢地送审稿件,优化稿件评价表,加强审稿意见反馈等措施,以此进行同行评议机制建设,优化整体流程。

关键词: 科技期刊, 同行评议, 优化策略, 审稿意愿, 同行评议形式, 审稿意见反馈

Abstract: [Purposes] This paper aims to explore the optimization strategies of peer review by investigating the current situation of peer review of scie.pngic journals based on the questionnaire survey of the reviewers and authors in Chinese pharmaceutical field. [Methods] Questionnaires concerning peer review process, peer review intention, peer review form, and feedback of review opinions were distributed to reviewers and authors. [Findings] We analyze and summarize the research results of peer review form, evaluation criteria, and feedback of review opinions, and further describe and analyze the consistency and difference of peer review opinions between reviewer group and author group. [Conclusions] In order to establish peer review mechanism and optimize the overall process, certain measures including enhancing the preliminary review and screening, submitting manuscripts to targeted reviewer, optimizing manuscript evaluation forms, and improving feedback of review opinions are proposed according to the results of investigation.

Key words: Scie.pngic journal, Peer review, Optimization strategy, Peer review intention, Peer review form, Feedback of review opinion