中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9): 1008-1012.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201607140647

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校学报(医学版)论文摘要撰写现状分析——以CSCD核心库期刊为例

侯集体   

  1. 鲁东大学校报编辑部,山东省烟台市芝罘区红旗中路186号 264025
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-14 修回日期:2016-09-07 出版日期:2016-09-15 发布日期:2016-09-15
  • 作者简介:侯集体(ORCID:0000-0002-7295-890X),硕士,编审,鲁东大学校报主编,E-mail: houjiti@163.com

The status analysis of abstract w riting in university journals(medical sciences): a case study of core journals in CSCD

HOU Jiti   

  1. Editorial Office of Journal of Ludong University, Hongqizhong Road 186, Zhifu District, Yantai264025, China
  • Received:2016-07-14 Revised:2016-09-07 Online:2016-09-15 Published:2016-09-15

摘要:

目的】研究高校学报(医学版)论文摘要撰写现状,为规范科技期刊论文摘要、提高期刊质量提供参考。【方法】采用文献资料法、对比分析法,以CSCD核心库收录的7种高校学报(医学版)为调查对象,统计分析2015年最后两期论文的中文摘要撰写状况。【结果】7种学报论文多采用四项结构式摘要,存在同类主题栏目的论文摘要结构不一样的现象;摘要的字数与稿约的要求相差甚远,字数差距很大,从100多字到900字的摘要都有;结构式摘要很好地避免了第一人称代词问题,非结构式摘要使用第一人称代词的情况比较严重;摘要的信息量较高,结构式摘要的信息含量高于非结构式摘要。【结论】要加快文摘编写规则等标准的修订步伐,积极开展科技期刊文摘标准化研究,提高作者与责任编辑的质量、规范意识,打造精品科技期刊。

关键词: 中文摘要, 撰写现状, 高校学报(医学版), CSCD

Abstract:

[Purposes]This paper aims to study the current situation of university journals(medical science) abstracts and provide a reference for regulating sci-tech journals abstracts and improve the quality of the journal.[Methods]By the literaturemethod and the comparative analysis, the seven university journals(medical science) included in CSCD were regarded as the investigation object, and the author analyzed the condition of Chinese abstracts in the final two papers, 2015.[Findings]The seven university journalsmainly adopted four-heading structured abstract, but abstract structures of the same theme were sometimes different;numbers of words were also far from the notice to contributors w ith a great difference ranging from 100 words to 900 words;structured abstracts usually used no first-person pronounswhile non-structured abstracts tended to usemore first-person pronouns;the information content of abstracts was higher;the information content of the structured abstract was higher than that of the nonstructured abstract.[Conclusions]Standards and rules for abstracts should be revised as soon as possible.Research for standardization of sci-tech journals abstracts should be actively carried out.It is necessary to improve authors'and editors'consciousness of quality and standardization in an effort to create high quality sci-tech journals.

Key words: Chinese abstract, Currentw riting situation, University journals(medical sciences), CSCD