中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 106-111. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201410231022

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CSSCI的我国开放存取研究可视化分析

董文鸳,袁顺波   

  1. 1 嘉兴学院图书馆,嘉兴市越秀南路56号 314001
    2 嘉兴学院商学院,嘉兴市越秀南路56号 314001
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-23 修回日期:2014-11-18 出版日期:2015-01-15 发布日期:2015-01-15
  • 作者简介:董文鸳(ORCID:0000-0002-0111-2480),馆员,硕士,E-mail: dongwy1981@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“科研人员持续自存储行为的影响因素及激励机制研究”(14CTQ046)

Visualization analysis of open access based on CSSCI

DONG Wenyuan,YUAN Shunbo   

  1. 1 Library of Jiaxing University,Jiaxing 314001,China
    2 School of Business,Jiaxing University,Jiaxing 314001,China
  • Received:2014-10-23 Revised:2014-11-18 Online:2015-01-15 Published:2015-01-15

摘要:

目的 系统了解我国开放存取研究的全貌,为该领域的后续研究提供参考。方法 采用可视化分析方法,从CSSCI数据库中获取文献信息,以CiteSpace III作为分析工具,从高影响力作者、高影响力期刊、高影响力文献、研究热点和研究前沿等角度展开分析。结果 李武、张晓林等学者及其文献是我国开放存取研究中的高影响力作者及文献,《中国图书馆学报》及《图书情报工作》是最具影响力的期刊,研究热点包括开放存取基础理论概述、自存储等7个主题,研究前沿经历了从自身形态研究向受众研究等方面的动态演进。结论 我国开放存取研究已取得了不错的成绩,但还存在着研究广度与深度不够以及实践建设落后于理论研究等方面的问题。

关键词: 开放存取, 知识图谱, 可视化分析, CSSCI, CiteSpace III

Abstract:

[Purpose] To demonstrate the whole status of research on open access in China and provide references for the followup studies.[Methodology] This paper uses the visualization analysismethod,retrieves the literature information from the CSSCI database and takes the CiteSpace IIIsoftware as the analytical tool,to conduct the analysis from the perspectives of highly-impact authors,highly-impact journals,highly-impact documents,hot topics and research frontiers.[Findings] The results show that Li Wu,Zhang Xiaolin and their articles are the highly-impactauthors and documents.Journal of Library Science in China and Library and Information service are themosthighly-impact journals.Basic theories of open access,self-archiving,etc.,are the hot topics.The research frontiers experienced the dynam ic evolution from the open access itself to the users.[Conclusions] The research on open access in China has achieved good results,while some shortcomings still exist,such as the research breadth and depth is not enough,and the practice lags behind the theoretical research.

Key words: open access, know ledgemap, visualization analysis, CSSCI, CiteSpace III