中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 139-142.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201409250929

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

《心理学报》开放性同行评审方式探索及初步成效

李金珍,庄景春,邱炳武   

  1. 《心理学报》编辑部,北京市朝阳区林萃路16号院 100101
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-25 修回日期:2015-01-30 出版日期:2015-02-15 发布日期:2015-02-15
  • 作者简介:李金珍(ORCID:0000-0001-9534-3185),博士,编辑,E-mail: lijz@psych.ac.cn

Trial on open peer review conducted by Acta Psychologica Sinica

LI Jinzhen,ZHUANG Jinchun,QIU Binwu   

  1. Editorial board of Acta Psychologica Sinica,16 Lincui Road,Chaoyang District,Beijing 100101,China
  • Received:2014-09-25 Revised:2015-01-30 Online:2015-02-15 Published:2015-02-15

摘要:

目的 为我国科技期刊进行开放性同行评审提供借鉴和思路。方法 介绍了《心理学报》在开放性同行评审方式上的探索,《心理学报》采用了“开放性同行评审”的一种变式——公开审稿意见。结果 经过充分讨论权衡试用“开放性同行评审”方式的利弊后,《心理学报》最终决定采用“公开审稿意见”这种“开放性同行评审”的变式。结论 除不能达到“缩短发表周期”的目标外,公开审稿意见的方式可以实现“开放性同行评审”的大部分初衷。

关键词: 开放性同行评审, 学术期刊创新, 心理学报

Abstract:

[Purpose] It is provided reference and suggestions for Chinese academ ic journals of open peer-review.[Methodology] The trial regarding open peer review conducted by Acta Psychologica Sinica was introduced in this paper.A variant of open peer review,review comments publicity,was adopted.[Findings] A fter full consideration and discussion on the pros and cons of open peer review,the editorial board of Acta Psychologica Sinica decided to disclose reviewers'comments and authors'response to public.[Conclusions] The method of review comments publicity could achieve almost all the main goals of open peer review except the goal of publishing period shortening.

Key words: Open peer review, Innovation of academic journals, Acta Psychologica Sinica