摘要：

【目的】 将编辑、管理者、作者、读者、审稿专家共同纳入研究视角,构建我国期刊编辑胜任力模型,探究这五类人群对编辑胜任力认识的差异性。【方法】 理论分析和实证分析相结合,采用问卷调查法收集数据,构建期刊编辑胜任力模型指标体系,使用SPSS和AMOS软件进行项目净化、探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析验证模型,最后通过均值和标准差分析揭示五类人群对期刊编辑胜任力评价的差异性。【结果】 期刊编辑胜任力模型包含知识、技能、能力以及特质四个维度。总体而言,胜任力模型的每一个构成因素的评价均值均较高;分维度分析,技能维度的均值得分最高,其次为知识维度,接着是特质维度,能力维度的均值得分最低。不同人群对编辑胜任力维度的评价各有特色。编辑和管理者的评价曲线分布更为相似,作者与读者评价曲线更为接近,审稿专家对编辑胜任力构成因素的重要性评价最低;编辑和管理者的评价情况更为稳定,作者、读者、审稿专家的评价情况较不稳定。【结论】 编辑首先应该提升专业技能;其次将自己定位为作者、读者、审稿专家的合作者,建立起广泛的社会网络;最后,践行“自教、自训、自觉”的发展路径。

关键词: 期刊编辑, 胜任力模型, 差异性, 评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to establish the competency model of journal editors and explore evaluation differences among journal editors, managers, authors, readers and reviewers. [Methods] The research methodology of this study combined theoretical analysis with authentic proof analysis. We collected the opinions of journal editors, managers, authors, readers and reviewers by questionnaire. Project purification, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor, mean analysis and standard deviation analysis were carried out by the SPSS and the AMOS. [Findings] The competency model of journal editor includes knowledge, skill, ability, and characteristics. In general, the average value of each factor in the competency model is large. Different people have different evaluation on the competency model. Character dimension is highly valued by editors, ability by managers, skill by authors and readers. Reviewers have equal evaluation on those four factors. And the evaluation curves of journal editors and managers are similar, the evaluation curves of authors and readers are similar. The evaluations of journal editors and managers are more stable, and the evaluations of authors, readers and reviewers are unstable. [Conclusions] The journal editors should improve their professional skills, then regard themselves as patterners of authors, readers and reviewers and establish extensive social network. Finally, journal editors must insist on self-improvement and practice the development path of “self-education, self-training, self-awareness”.

Key words: Journal editor, Competency model, Difference, Evaluation