Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to provide references for China's scientific journals to apply for major international databases by systematically examining the latest selection criteria. [Methods] We systematically studied the selection criteria of major international databases and the reasons for journal rejections through literature research, comparative analysis, and case studies. In addition, we conducted qualitative analysis on representative successful application journals. [Findings] Major international databases have strict standards and standardized procedures for journal selection. Chinese scientific journals must adhere strictly to these application processes and specifications when applying. They should meticulously prepare for the application process, conduct pre-self-assessments, and learn from recently successful application cases. [Conclusions] The inclusion in major international databases is crucial for disseminating China's scientific and technological achievements and enhancing academic influence. It can also propel China's scientific journals to the forefront globally. At the same time, China should actively enhance its information security capacity for scientific literature and strengthen the construction of publishing, communication, and service platforms with broad international influence. This will truly realize the internationalization of China's journals.

Key words: Scientific journal, Major international database, Selection criteria, Application case

摘要：

【目的】 系统梳理国际重要数据库的最新收录规则，为我国科技期刊申请相关数据库收录提供参考。【方法】 采用文献调研法、对比分析法、案例研究法对国际重要数据库的遴选标准以及期刊被剔除原因进行系统梳理，并针对代表性成功申请案例进行定性分析。【结果】 国际重要数据库对于期刊的遴选均有一套严格的标准及规范化程序，我国科技期刊在申请时必须严格遵循申请流程和规范，认真细致地做好申请准备工作，必要时可预先进行自评估或参考最新的成功申请案例。【结论】 加入国际重要数据库是我国科技成果传播和科技期刊影响力提升的重要途径，是科技期刊大国向科技期刊强国迈进的重要举措；但与此同时，我国也应积极推进科技文献信息安全保障能力建设，加强具有广泛国际影响力的出版、传播和服务平台建设，从而真正实现我国期刊出版国际化的创新可持续发展。

关键词: 科技期刊, 国际重要数据库, 遴选标准, 申请案例