Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the main problems existing in the current authorship system and propose the corresponding countermeasures. [Methods] Using online survey method and literature survey method, this paper analyzed the current authorship system from the perspectives of scientific journals, scientific research management institutions, funding agencies, and researchers. [Findings] The authorship system has problems such as lack of uniformity of authorship standards, low disclosure of author contributions, and failure to cover all contributing roles. It can be improved from four aspects, including establishing universal authorship standards, adopting CRediT contribution taxonomy, establishing associations with ORCID, and developing the scientific research evaluation index system. [Conclusions] The transparency and accessibility of author contributions should be improved to provide evaluation indicators based on specific contributions for researchers in the professional title evaluation, performance appraisal, and project application.

Key words: Authorship, Author contribution, Research evaluation, CRediT taxonomy

摘要：

【目的】 梳理归纳现行论文作者署名制度存在的主要问题并提出相应的对策。【方法】 采用网络调查法、文献调研法,从科技期刊、科研管理机构、资助机构及研究人员等视角对现行论文作者署名制度进行分析。【结果】 作者署名制度存在作者身份标准缺乏统一性、作者贡献揭示程度低、未能涵盖所有的贡献角色等问题,可以从建立通用的作者身份标准、采用CRediT贡献分类法、与ORCID建立关联、建立健全科研评价指标体系四个方面进行补充完善。【结论】 提高作者贡献的透明性和可获取性,为研究人员的职称评定、绩效考核、项目申请等提供基于具体贡献的评价指标。

关键词: 作者署名, 作者贡献, 科研评价, CRediT分类法