Abstract:

Purposes To comprehensively and systematically explore strategies for enhancing the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals， scientifically and accurately disseminate excellent scientific research achievements， and promote the high-quality development of scientific journals. Methods By combining the Hall’s three-dimensional model with the practice of editing and publishing scientific journals， and utilizing the theory of the Hall’s three-dimensional model， we systematically analyzed the current status of the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals and the three-dimensional influencing factors. We identified the correspondence between the three-dimensional factors of the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals and the “three dimensions” in the Hall’s three-dimensional model， and outlined the concepts and characteristics of the Hall’s three-dimensional model for the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals. Findings We constructed a Hall’s three-dimensional model for the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals； clarified the concepts of the Hall’s three-dimensional model for the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals， and summarized its four characteristics； and explored three-dimensional improvement strategies for the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals from three dimensions： professional knowledge and skills， time nodes and stages， and journal publishing processes. Conclusions The constructed Hall’s three-dimensional model for the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals treats the three-dimensional factors affecting the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals as a whole system， emphasizing the integrity， systematicness， and unity of the system， and comprehensively considering the balance and coordination of various factors， thereby achieving the effect of enhancing the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals. The research results can provide references for scientific journal managers， editors， and other relevant personnel in controlling the editing and proofreading quality and formulating strategies for enhancing the editing and proofreading quality of scientific journals.

Key words: Scientific journals, Editing and proofreading quality, Hall’s three-dimensional model, Professional knowledge and skills dimension, Time nodes and stages dimension, Journal publishing processes dimension, Three-dimensional factors

摘要：

目的 为全面系统探讨科技期刊编校质量提升策略，科学、准确传播优秀科研成果，促进科技期刊高质量发展。方法 将霍尔三维模型与科技期刊编辑出版实践相结合，借助霍尔三维模型理论，系统梳理科技期刊编校质量现状及三维影响因素，找出科技期刊编校质量三维因素与霍尔三维模型中“三维”的对应关系，梳理科技期刊编校质量霍尔三维模型的概念及特点。结果 构建科技期刊编校质量霍尔三维模型；明确科技期刊编校质量霍尔三维模型的概念并总结科技期刊编校质量霍尔三维模型的特点；从专业知识和技能、时间节点阶段、期刊出版环节3个维度探讨科技期刊编校质量三维因素提升策略。结论 构建的科技期刊编校质量霍尔三维模型将影响科技期刊编校质量的三维因素作为一个整体系统来看待，强调系统的整体性、系统性、统一性，综合考虑各因素的平衡协调，从而实现科技期刊编校质量提升。研究结果可为科技期刊管理人员及编辑等相关人员控制编校质量和制定科技期刊编校质量提升策略提供参考。

关键词: 科技期刊, 编校质量, 霍尔三维模型, 专业知识和技能维度, 时间节点阶段维度, 期刊出版环节维度, 三维因素