[1] |
张智雄. 在开放科学和AI时代塑造新型学术交流模式[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2024, 35(5):561-567.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202404220398
|
[2] |
方卿, 郑昂, 曾建勋. 预印本学术交流模式演化历程与我国发展对策研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(4):56-71.
|
[3] |
颜兆萍, 石进, 邵波, 等. 科学公地:去中心化的科学出版机制[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2024, 35(9):1253-1262.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202404020317
|
[4] |
Powell K. Does it take too long to publish research?[J]. Nature, 2016, 530(7589): 148-151.
|
[5] |
Simcoe T S, Waguespack D M. Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name?[J]. ManagementScience, 2010, 57(2): 274-290.
|
[6] |
Soderberg C K, Errington T M, Nosek B A. Credibility of preprints: An interdisciplinary survey of researchers[J]. RoyalSocietyOpenScience, 2020, 7(10): 201520.
|
[7] |
Fry C, MacGarvie M. Author country of origin and attention on open science platforms: Evidence from COVID-19 preprints[J]. ManagementScience, 2023, 70(8): 5426-5444.
|
[8] |
Nishioka C, Färber M, Saier T. How does author affiliation affect preprint citation count?analyzing citation bias at the institution and country level[C]// 2022 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). Cologne, 2022: 1-8.
|
[9] |
许林玉. 高被引论文核心影响因素判别研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2023, 13(5):137-148.
|
[10] |
Bornmann L, Schier H, Marx W, et al. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?[J]. JournalofInformetrics, 2012, 6(1): 11-18.
|
[11] |
Petersen A M, Fortunato S, Pan R K, et al. Reputation and impact in academic careers[J]. ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences, 2014, 111(43): 15316-15321.
|
[12] |
蒋易, 侯海燕, 黄福, 等. 高被引科学家在社交媒体网络中的影响力研究[J]. 科学与管理, 2020, 40(3):21-26.
|
[13] |
Janda G, Khetpal V, Shi X T, et al. Comparison of clinical study results reported in medRxiv preprints vs peer-reviewed journal articles[J]. JAMANetworkOpen, 2022, 5(12): e2245847.
|
[14] |
Brierley L, Nanni F, Polka J K, et al. Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic[J]. PLoSBiology, 2022, 20(2): e3001285.
|
[15] |
Shibayama S, Yin D Y, Matsumoto K. Measuring novelty in science with word embedding[J]. PloSOne, 2021, 16(7): e0254034.
|
[16] |
Foster J G, Rzhetsky A, Evans J A. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies[J]. AmericanSociologicalReview, 2015, 80(5): 875-908.
|
[17] |
Boudreau K J, Guinan E C, Lakhani K R, et al. Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science[J]. ManagementScience, 2016, 62(10): 2765-2783.
|
[18] |
Dahlin K B, Behrens D M. When is an invention really radical?: Defining and measuring technological radicalness[J]. ResearchPolicy, 2005, 34(5): 717-737.
|
[19] |
Trapido D. How novelty in knowledge earns recognition: The role of consistent identities[J]. ResearchPolicy, 2015, 44(8): 1488-1500.
|
[20] |
Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, et al. Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
doi: 10.1126/science.1240474
pmid: 24159044
|
[21] |
Wang J, Veugelers R, Stephan P. Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators[J]. ResearchPolicy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-1436.
|
[22] |
Lin Y L, Frey C B, Wu L F. Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas[J]. Nature, 2023, 623(7989): 987-991.
|
[23] |
Hendricks G, Tkaczyk D, Lin J, et al. Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata[J]. QuantitativeScienceStudies, 2020, 1(1): 414-427.
|
[24] |
Fang Z C, Costas R. Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric.com[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 123(2): 1077-1101.
|
[25] |
王智琦. 预印本的科学交流功能及其多维测评[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2020.
|
[26] |
Merton R K. The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered[J]. Science, 1968, 159(3810): 56-63.
pmid: 5634379
|
[27] |
Barabási A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
pmid: 10521342
|