Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the differences between the comprehensive index and h series index in the evaluation of journal core authors.[Methods] Based on the statistic data of author, quantity and cited frequency of papers published in Acta Editologica from 2010 to 2015, the core authors were evaluated by comprehensive index and h series index, and the evaluation results were analyzed, as well as their correlation.[Findings] The results show that there are 22 core authors on Acta Editologica in 2010—2015 evaluated by the two different indexes, respectively. Because of the different calculation methods, the evaluation results of these indexes are different.[Conclusions] Comprehensive index could evaluate the core authors of journals effectively due to its high discrimination. The h index should be combined with the h_m index for its lower discrimination in the evaluation of core authors. There is no correlation between comprehensive index and standardized h index, while it shows a significant linear correlation between comprehensive index and h and h_m indexes.

Key words: Comprehensive index, h series index, Core authors, Author evaluation, Acta Editologica

摘要：

【目的】 探讨综合指数法和h系列指数法在期刊核心作者测评方面的异同。【方法】 统计2010—2015年在《编辑学报》上发表的文章及其作者,利用综合指数和h系列指数测定《编辑学报》的核心作者,并对不同方法测评排序结果进行描述性分析和相关性研究。【结果】 由综合指数和h指数测评的《编辑学报》2010—2015年的核心作者均有22位;但由于计算方法不同,各种指数的评测结果存在差异。【结论】 综合指数区分度较高,可有效测评期刊的核心作者;h指数在期刊作者的测评上,缺乏区分度,需要和h_m指数结合起来使用。综合指数与标准化h指数之间不存在相关关系,与h指数和h_m指数相关性显著,呈线性相关。

关键词: 综合指数, h系列指数, 核心作者, 作者测评, 《编辑学报》