[Purposes] In view of the problems in the construction of Chinese marine think tank, we explore the methods for oceanography journals to serve the think tank construction. [Methods] Through investigation, we analyzed the status quo of and problems in the construction of Chinese marine think tank, summarized the common practices of academic journals to serve think tank, and explored other methods for oceanography journals to actively participate in the construction of think tank. [Findings] At the moment, Chinese marine think tank fails to be perspective or targeted, with unobvious brand characteristics, lack of multidisciplinary integration, and no emphasis on the service for the governance. Oceanography journals should serve the think tank through demand-oriented topic selection, forums and columns, and online first publication in addition to delivering knowledge resources, talent resources, and brand resources to the government, enterprises, and society. [Conclusions] Based on years of accumulated information, academic journals should strive to attract the attention of enterprises and governments, focus on key issues, and select outstanding research outcomes, thus providing scientific and authoritative information for the decision-making of governments and enterprises in increasing scientific knowledge, implementing scientific and technological strategies, and improving economic benefits.
Think tank construction,
Forum and column
崔尚公, 李雪, 王少朋, 袁泽轶, 李红军. 学术期刊参与智库决策服务功能建设的可行路径——以海洋学期刊为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33(8): 1013-1018.
CUI Shanggong, LI Xue, WANG Shaopeng, YUAN Zeyi, LI Hongjun. Methods for academic journals to serve the decision-making of think tank: A case study of oceanography journals[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2022, 33(8): 1013-1018.