摘要： 本文旨在探讨如何评审科技论文。审稿人在稿件评审过程中通常需要履行以下四个方面的工作：①按审稿单的评审要求判断稿件是否适合于发表；②就稿件可否直接录用、修改后录用或退稿给出建议；③给稿件的作者提供详细的评审意见；④给期刊的编辑提供详细的评审意见。科技论文的评审应基于重要性、学术性、论证是否充分及文字表达等方面。本文结合笔者本人的经历探讨如何按审稿单的要求评审稿件、如何给稿件的作者和期刊的编辑提供详细的评审意见，以及有关审稿风格、礼貌等方面的事项。论文评审的目的在子其能否进一步提高可录用稿件的总体质量。

Abstract: This paper gives advice to readers who are asked to referee a scientific paper,Normally there are at least four things youhave to do：(1)complete an evaluation form about the suitability Of the paper for publication； (2)make an overall recommendationabout whether or not the paper should be accepted outright’accepted subject to revisions’or rejected；3 provide comments bor theauthors that support your judgment：and 4 provide similar additional comments for the editor,Scientific papers need to be judgedon the basis of their significance’scholarship’evidence and presentation,This particular article provides an account of the writer's ownprocedures when dealing with evaluation forms’and writing comments for editors and authors’and it also provides some general adviceabout matters of style and courtesy, The aim’when reviewing acceptable papers’is to see if you can help to improve them further.