摘要：

目的 分析已经发表的学术不端论文的特征,尽量避免漏检情况的发生。方法 利用科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统（AMLC）对《放射学实践》杂志2015年发表的301篇论文进行检测,并对认定为不端论文在发表之前的检测过程进行追踪、溯源。结果 6篇被认定为不端论文,其中3篇论文的文字重合度≥40%;论文发表之前进行的两次检测中,6篇论文的文字重合度均＞40%;5篇的发表时间与被抄袭文献的发表时间接近（不超过3个月）;4篇不端论文与被抄袭文献存在作者重合。结论 通过分析漏检不端论文的特征,做好以下三点：①检测者采取正确的检测策略,坚持在出刊前进行最后的检测;②AMLC及时更新对比数据库;③更多的期刊采用“稿件追踪”功能,AMLC对学术不端论文的漏检将大幅减少。

关键词: 学术不端文献检测系统, 已发表论文, 文字重合度, 《放射学实践》

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the features of academ ic m isconduct paperswhich have been published in order to avoid the occurrence ofmissed detection asmuch as possible.[Methods] Three hundred and one papers published on the journal of Radiologic Practice in 2015 were detected by the academic misconduct literature check system（AMLC）.The detection process of academicmisconduct papers before publication was tracked and the characteristics of academic misconduct papers were analyzed.[Findings] Six paperswere identified as academicmisconduct papers with literal similarity≥40%in three papers.Literal similarity rates of six paperswere all less than 40%in the academicmisconduct check before publication;the publication time of five paperswas close to that of plagiarism documents（within threemonths）; authors of four papers coincided with those of plagiarism documents.[Conclusions] By analyzing the characteristics of academicm isconduct papers, m issed detection w ill be decreased obviously by taking the follow ing three measures： firstly, we should take the correct detection method and the final checking before publication is necessary; secondly, the database should be updated timely; thirdly, we should call formore journals using the“document tracking”function.

Key words: Academ ic misconduct literature check system, Published papers, Literal sim ilarity, Radiologic Practice