中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 243-248.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201510010950

• 专题:GB/T 7714-2015解读与探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

参考文献中标准著录格式的新规定及其影响——以 GB/T 7714—2015为例

黄城烟   

  1. 四川大学文学与新闻学院,成都市望江路29号 610064
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-01 修回日期:2016-01-14 出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-03-15
  • 作者简介:黄城烟(ORCID:0000-0003-4143-3999),博士生,E-mail: hcy51888@sina.com。

A study on the new rule of the reference recording format standard and its adverse effects:taking GB/T 7714—2015 as an example

HUANG Chengyan   

  1. The College of Literature and Journalism of Sichuan University,29Wangjiang Road,Chengdu 610064,China
  • Received:2015-10-01 Revised:2016-01-14 Online:2016-03-15 Published:2016-03-15

摘要:

【目的】对GB/T 7714—2015中“标准号”著录为“其他题名信息”的规定提出商榷意见。【方法】从逻辑上论证GB/T 7714—2015这一规定的不合理性,并与国内外有关标准对比,分析了新规定可能带来的不利影响。【结果】新规定与有关标准不能协调配套,不符合国际标准和行业习惯,可能造成歧义或识别困难,并且实施成本过高。【结论】建议将“标准号”著录为“题名”,恢复“标准号标准名”的著录格式。

关键词: GB/T 7714—2015, 参考文献著录规则, 标准号, 标准名, 商榷

Abstract:

[Purposes] The papermakes a discussion on the rule that Standard Number is substituted for Other Title Information in GB/T 7714 —2015.[Methods] The irrationality of the new rule is demonstrated logically.Compared w ith domestic and foreign standards, the potential adverse effects have been analyzed in this paper.[Findings] There is am ismatch between the new rule and international standards and traditions, probably leading to the m isunderstanding and high implementation costs.[Conclusions] Suggestions are given that Standard Number isw ritten as Title Name and the previous format is reverted, that is, Standard Number Standard Name.

Key words: GB/T 7714 — 2015, Rules for Bibliographic References and Citations to Information Resources, Standard Number, Standard Name, Discussion