摘要:
【目的】对GB/T 7714—2015中“标准号”著录为“其他题名信息”的规定提出商榷意见。【方法】从逻辑上论证GB/T 7714—2015这一规定的不合理性,并与国内外有关标准对比,分析了新规定可能带来的不利影响。【结果】新规定与有关标准不能协调配套,不符合国际标准和行业习惯,可能造成歧义或识别困难,并且实施成本过高。【结论】建议将“标准号”著录为“题名”,恢复“标准号标准名”的著录格式。
关键词:
GB/T 7714—2015,
参考文献著录规则,
标准号,
标准名,
商榷
Abstract:
[Purposes] The papermakes a discussion on the rule that Standard Number is substituted for Other Title Information in GB/T 7714 —2015.[Methods] The irrationality of the new rule is demonstrated logically.Compared w ith domestic and foreign standards, the potential adverse effects have been analyzed in this paper.[Findings] There is am ismatch between the new rule and international standards and traditions, probably leading to the m isunderstanding and high implementation costs.[Conclusions] Suggestions are given that Standard Number isw ritten as Title Name and the previous format is reverted, that is, Standard Number Standard Name.
Key words:
GB/T 7714 — 2015,
Rules for Bibliographic References and Citations to Information Resources,
Standard Number,
Standard Name,
Discussion
黄城烟. 参考文献中标准著录格式的新规定及其影响——以 GB/T 7714—2015为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(3): 243-248.
HUANG Chengyan. A study on the new rule of the reference recording format standard and its adverse effects:taking GB/T 7714—2015 as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2016, 27(3): 243-248.