中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 537-544.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201810170925

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

人文学科期刊评价新视角:以人评文,以文评刊——以中国语言文学为例

侯鑫鑫1,2),谢琳1,2),朱莉1,2),朱文佳1,2),张敏1),廖剑岚1),任磊1),王乐1,2)()   

  1. 1) 复旦大学图书馆,上海市杨浦区邯郸路220号 200433
    2) 复旦大学人文社科评价研究中心,上海市杨浦区国年路300号 200433
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-17 修回日期:2019-01-17 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 王乐 E-mail:lewang@fudan.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:侯鑫鑫(ORCID:0000-0002-8878-1950),硕士,助理馆员,情报分析馆员,E-mail: houxinxin@fudan.edu.cn|谢 琳,硕士,副研究馆员,情报研究主管|朱 莉,硕士,馆员,情报研究部主任|朱文佳,博士,馆员,情报分析馆员|张 敏,硕士,副研究馆员,参考咨询部主任|廖剑岚,硕士,副研究馆员,文科学科组长|任 磊,硕士,工程师,数据管理与技术部副主任

New perspective to evaluate journals in the humanities via evaluating articles by author and evaluating journals by articles:Taking Chinese language and literature as an example

HOU Xinxin1,2),XIE Lin1,2),ZHU Li1,2),ZHU Wenjia1,2),ZHANG Min1),LIAO Jianlan1),REN Lei1),WANG Le1,2)()   

  1. 1) Library of Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China
    2) Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation and Research Center, Fudan University, 300 Guonian Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2018-10-17 Revised:2019-01-17 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-31
  • Contact: WANG Le E-mail:lewang@fudan.edu.cn

摘要:

【目的】 为了在期刊评价中体现人文学科以“人”为核心的学科特点,从多个维度揭示期刊的办刊特色。【方法】 采用文献调研、专家访谈、问卷调查和文献计量的方法,以中国语言文学作为分析对象,收集其下属二级学科的期刊&集刊数据,将调研所得的定性指标定量化,以构建评价指标体系,并且创新性地将学术集刊纳入评价体系。【结果】 提出"以人评文,以文评刊"的评价思路,认为刊物的学术影响力由其作者的影响力来决定,即该刊聚集核心作者的数量越多,核心作者发表文章的数量越多,则该刊物的学术影响力越高。以期刊&集刊的核心作者强度和基于核心作者的学术影响力为主要指标,以年均机构方差、跨学科引用、5年影响因子等为辅助指标,从多个维度揭示期刊&集刊的办刊特色。【结论】 所提出的评价方法可为人文学科期刊评价提供全新视角,对我国人文学科期刊评价体系的建设和完善具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 以“人”为核心, 定性指标定量化, 集刊评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to reflect the academic characteristics of the humanities with "author" as the core in the evaluation of journals, and reveal the journal achievements of their missions and goals in multiple dimensions. [Methods] Taking Chinese language and literature as the analytic object, we collected the journal (collection) data of their secondary disciplines by the literature research, expert interview, questionnaire survey, and bibliometric methods, the qualitative indicators obtained from the survey were quantified, and after that we constructed the evaluation system. The academic collections were innovatively incorporated into the evaluation system. [Finding] We put forward the evaluation method of "evaluating articles by author and evaluating journals by articles". We think the academic influence of journals is determined by the influence of the authors of articles published in journals, that is, the more the journal gathers core authors, the more articles published by core authors, the higher the academic influence of the journal. We use the intensity of core authors and academic influence based on core authors as main index, and use the annual average institutional variance, interdisciplinary citations, and five-year impact factors as auxiliary indexes, to reveal the characteristics of journals & collections from multiple dimensions. [Conclusions] This study provides new perspective to evaluate journals of humanities, and the proposed evaluation method can provide references to construct and improve the evaluation system of humanity journals in China.

Key words: Taking "authors" as the core, Quantifying qualitative indicator, Evaluation of collection