中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 231-236.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201709180788

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

智能集体评审的缘起和特征

周京艳,黄裕荣,刘如,张惠娜   

  1. 北京市科学技术情报研究所,北京市西城区西外大街140号 100044
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-18 修回日期:2018-01-10 出版日期:2018-03-25 发布日期:2018-03-15
  • 作者简介:周京艳(ORCID:0000-0003-0599-0130),博士,助理研究员,E-mail:zhouyan- 720@163.com; 黄裕荣,硕士,助理研究员; 刘 如,硕士,助理研究员; 张惠娜,博士,助理研究员。

Origin and feature of intelligent crowd review

ZHOU Jingyan,HUANG Yurong,LIU Ru,ZHANG Huina   

  1. Beijing Institute of Science and Technology Information, 140 Xiwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2017-09-18 Revised:2018-01-10 Online:2018-03-25 Published:2018-03-15

摘要:

目的 探索智能集体评审的流程、特征及对我国同行评审的启示。方法 介绍智能集体评审实验,概括智能集体评审的特征,分析其对我国学术期刊同行评审的启示。结果 智能集体评审是一种限时的在线开放同行评审,采取专家匿名评审方式。评审过程中,评审人之间可进行学术交流。评审意见快速而全面,有利于提高论文的学术质量,是一种可行的同行评审方式。结论 作为一种全新的同行评审方式,智能集体评审全面推行尚需时日,但其给当前同行评审以重要启示:一是加快信息技术的应用;二是为评审专家提供交流机会。

关键词: 智能集体评审, 开放同行评审, 匿名评审

Abstract:

[Purposes] The purposes of this study are to explore the process and characteristics of intelligent crowd review and the enlightenment to peer review of Chinese scientific journals.[Methods] We introduced the experiment of intelligent crowd review from Prof. Benjamin List, the editor-in-chief of Synlett, summarized the characteristics of intelligent crowd review, and analyzed the enlightenment to improve the peer review of Chinese academic journals.[Findings] Intelligent crowd review is a time-limited online peer review, and it is a type of anonymous review. During the review process, the reviewers can communicate with each other about the academic questions and exchange opinions. The review comments are quick and comprehensive, which is conducive to improving the quality of academic papers, and it is also a feasible way of peer review.[Conclusions] As a new way of peer review, intelligent crowd review gives an important enlightenment to the current peer review, such as speeding up the application of information technology and providing reviewers with the opportunity to communicate with each other.

Key words: Intelligent crowd review, Open peer review, Anonymous review