中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 1049-1060.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201607010582

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

影子编校的剖析及纠防策略

朱银全1),王辉2)()   

  1. 1) 西安石油大学思想政治理论教学科研部,陕西省西安市电子二路18号 710065
    2) 西安石油大学期刊中心,陕西省西安市电子二路18号 710065
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-01 修回日期:2016-09-25 出版日期:2016-10-15 发布日期:2016-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 王辉 E-mail:lisha-wang@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱银全(ORCID:0000-0003-0111-6307),学士,副教授,E-mail:yqzhu@x syu.edu.cn

The analysis on the phantom redactors and strategies for preventing and correcting them

ZHU Yinquan1),WANG Hui2)()   

  1. 1) Teaching and Research Center of Ideological and Political Theory,Xi'an Shiyou University,18 Dianzier Road,Xi'an 710065,China
    2) Journal Center,Xi'an Shiyou University,18 Dianzier Road,Xi'an 710065,China
  • Received:2016-07-01 Revised:2016-09-25 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2016-10-15
  • Contact: WANG Hui E-mail:lisha-wang@163.com

摘要:

【目的】杜绝影子编校对期刊质量和编校团队的不良影响,探索防止影子编校的方法,以期为更多刊社提供预防和纠正影子编校的方法参考。【方法】从科技期刊编校工作的主要流程和特点入手,从内因和外因角度剖析产生影子编校的原因及影子编校对科技期刊的影响。【结果】产生影子编校的因素主要为编辑素养欠缺、职业倦怠、情商不够、工作量过大、晋升受阻和制度缺失。影子编校不仅给科技期刊的质量和发展带来很大的负面影响,而且还会涣散编校团队。【结论】必须消除影子编校。可通过完善的激励机制、健全的规章制度、贴心的人文关怀以及继续教育四项策略杜绝影子编校。

关键词: 影子编校, 科技期刊编辑, 编校质量, 编辑素养, 激励机制

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to putan end to adverse effects of the phantom redactors on the journal quality and redaction team.It also provides references to prevent and correct the phantom redactors for more magazines.Some methods have been explored.[Methods] Based on the characteristics andmain processes of compiling and proofreading scientific journalmanuscripts,it analyzed the real causes of the phantom redactors and looked for the influence of the phantom redactors for scientific journals.[Findings] The factors leading to the phantom redactors are as follows:lacking professional quality and work ethic,having very low emotion-quotient level,job burnout,excessive workload,the difficulty to get promoted in their professional titles,the absence of related system.The phantom redactors not only seriously influence the quality and future of scientific periodicals,but also break the editorial teams.[Conclusions] We must elim inate the phantom redactors.It could eliminate the phantom redactors by perfect incentivemechanism,sound regulations,close humanistic care and continuing education.

Key words: The phantom redactors, Scientific journal editor, Editing quality, Accomplishment of editors, Incentivemechanism