中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 645-649. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201512241201

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于循环修正思路的科技期刊综合评价

刘莲花   

  1. 海南医学院公共卫生学院,海南省海口市龙华区学院路3号 571199
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-24 修回日期:2016-03-11 出版日期:2016-06-15 发布日期:2016-06-15
  • 作者简介:刘莲花(ORCID:0000-0003-0202-3356),硕士,讲师,E-mail:liulianhua. 009@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    2016年海南省教育厅科学研究项目(Hnky2016-30)

Comprehensive evaluation of scientific journals based on circulating revision

LIU Lianhua   

  1. School of Public Health, Hainan Medical University, 3 Xueyuan Road, Longhua District, Haikou 571199, China
  • Received:2015-12-24 Revised:2016-03-11 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2016-06-15

摘要:

【目的】采用循环修正的组合评价方法对期刊进行综合评价,以解决多种评价方法结论的非一致性问题。【方法】先采用TOPSIS法、主成分分析法、因子分析法和加权算术平均法对预防医学与卫生学核心期刊进行了综合评价,并通过肯达尔一致性系数对四种方法进行了一致性检验,然后利用平均值法、Borda法、Copeland法对四种单一评价结果进行了循环修正评价。【结果】经过两次循环评价得到了一致的结论。【结论】循环修正的组合评价方法能有效解决多种评价方法结论的非一致性问题,从而提高期刊评价的全面性和科学性。

关键词: 期刊评价, 组合评价, 循环修正

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to solve the inconsistency problem of different evaluation conclusions. We propose using the comprehensive evaluation method that revises things circularly.[Methods] In this paper, firstly, we used the TOPSIS evaluation method, principle component analysis, factor analysis and weighted arithmetic mean method to evaluate preventive medicine and hygiene core journals. We tested the consistency of the four methods through the Kendall consistent coefficient. Secondly,we evaluated the respective evaluation results above by circulation revision with the mean method,Borda method and Copeland method.[Findings] The consistent conclusion was obtained after two circulation revisions.[Conclusions] The circulation revision method can effectively solve the inconsistency problem and improve the scientificity of the evaluation.

Key words: Journal evaluation, Combination evaluation, Circulation revision