摘要：
目的 分析中医药学期刊的学术深度和学术规范。方法 以北京大学《中文核心期刊要目总览》（2011年版）所收录之19种中医药学期刊2004–2012年的发文和引文数据作为统计对象,采用文献计量学的方法,对中医药学期刊的四项指标——标注参考文献论文比、篇均引文量、期刊基金论文比和期刊作者地区分布进行分析比较。结果 我国中医药学期刊的学术规范性在不断提高,总体状况良好,但是个别期刊在个别指标上尚有进一步提升的空间。结论 中医药高校学报应打破地区囿限,进一步扩大论文作者来源的广度;刊载临床经验总结类论文占比较大的期刊要加强论文规范性的审核,提高研究的科学性。
关键词:
中医药学,
学术规范,
期刊评价,
中文医药科学引文索引
Abstract:
[Purpose] This paper analyzes the research depth and academ ic standardization of Chinese medicine journals.[Methodology] We use bibliometricsmethods and take 19 core journals of Chinesemedicine which were indexed in“A Guide to the Core Journal of China（2011 ed.）”published by Peking University as sample,and compare the four indicators used in journal evaluation,namely,ratio of tagging the references,average citation quantity,ratio of funded papers and span of regional distribution for author.[Findings] Academ ic standardization of the TCM journals has been improving.The overall is good,but individual journals still have room for improvement on individual indicators.[Conclusions] All analytical conclusions are based on the citations and cites among the 19 kinds of Chinese medicine journals between 2004 and 2012.On the one hand,university journals of TCM should break the geographical restrictions,and further expand the breath of authors,on the other hand,if journals of TCM published clinical experience papers accounting for a certain percentage,they should strengthen the audit of the academ ic standardization for improving the scientific level of the research.
Key words:
Chinesemedicine,
Academ ic standardization,
Journal evaluation,
Chinesemedicine science citation index
钱爱兵. 中医药学期刊学术规范量化分析——基于 CMSCI（2004–2012）年度数据[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015, 26(2): 210-216.
QIAN Aibing. Academ ic standardization of Chinesemedicine journals：analysis based on CMSCI（2004–2012）[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2015, 26(2): 210-216.