摘要：
目的 更好地了解我国科技期刊相关引证指标数据库的情况。方法 对科技期刊引证指标数据库（CSCD-JCR）、《中国科技期刊引证报告（核心版）》（CJCR）、万方数据的期刊统计分析与评价、维普资讯的中文科技期刊评价报告、中国知网的个刊影响力统计分析数据库这5个科技期刊引证指标数据库进行对比分析,详细分析比较了其引证指标组成及用于评价科技期刊的功能。结果 由于统计数据源不同,各引证指标数据库的引证指标数据差距较大。结论 用综合评价指标对期刊排名较单一指标排名能更准确反映期刊的学术水平和行业影响力;基于大型数据库的引证指标能更准确、全面地反映期刊被引用和传播情况,但基于源期刊的CSCD-JCR和CJCR引证指标更具有代表性,能更准确反映期刊的学术影响力和学科地位。
关键词:
科技期刊,
引证指标,
期刊评价,
来源期刊
Abstract:
[Purpose] To better understand the relevant circumstances of citation index database of Chinese scientific journals.[Methodology] A comparative analysis of 5 citation index database of Scientific and technical journals,which are CSCD-JCR,CJCR,statistical analysis and evaluation of journals by Wanfang Database Corporation,Chinese scientific journals evaluation report of VIP information,and journal influence statistical analysis database by CNKI,were made.A detailed analysis to the function of evaluation to Scientific journals by citation index was done.[Findings] The results show that because of the different statistical data source,the difference of the citation index data in different citation index database is great.[Conclusions] The journal ranking according to the comprehensive evaluation index ismore accurate than the one according to the single index data.The citation index based on large database can reflect the situation of journal cited and spread more accurately and comprehensively.But the citation index based on the CSCD-JCR and CJCR can bemore representative,and can reflect the journal academic influence and status of disciplinemore accurately.
Key words:
Scientific journal,
Citation index,
Journal evaluation,
Source journal
熊水斌,彭桃英,骆超,周红梅. 我国科技期刊引证指标数据库的对比分析与评价[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015, 26(2): 198-204.
XIONG Shuibin,PENG Taoying,LUO Chao,ZHOU Hongmei. Com parative analysis on citation index databases of Chinese scientific journals[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2015, 26(2): 198-204.