[1] |
Csiszar A. Peer review: Troubled from the start[J]. Nature, 2016,532(7599):306-308.
doi: 10.1038/532306a
URL
pmid: 27111616
|
[2] |
Haffar S, Bazerbachi F, Murad M H. Peer review bias:A critical review[J]. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2019,94(4):670-676.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.004
URL
pmid: 30797567
|
[3] |
International congress on peer review and scientific publication[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://peerreviewcongress.org/index.html.
URL
|
[4] |
Meadows A. Peer review week—A celebration![EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://orcid.org/blog/2015/09/09/peer-review-week-celebration.
URL
|
[5] |
BMC. Research integrity and peer review[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com.
URL
|
[6] |
王凤产. 科技期刊开放性同行评议案例研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018,29(3):242-247.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201711080921
URL
|
[7] |
刘晶晶. 国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式研究[J]. 编辑学报, 2017,29(2):200-203.
|
[8] |
周京艳, 黄裕荣, 刘如, 等. 智能集体评审的缘起和特征[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018,29(3):231-236.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201709180788
URL
|
[9] |
贺子岳, 张子纬, 陈晓峰. 学术期刊出版后开放式同行评议模式研究[J]. 传媒, 2019(17):32-34.
|
[10] |
黄历. 第三方审稿平台及其在国内科技期刊领域实施的可行性[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019,30(1):29-33.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201807150622
URL
|
[11] |
孟美任, 张晓林. 中国科技期刊引入开放同行评议机制的思考与建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019,30(2):149-155.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201811120995
URL
|
[12] |
张春丽, 商丽娜, 倪四秀. 科技期刊开放式同行评议模式探索[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(11):1151-1155.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201507090620
URL
|
[13] |
马瀚青, 周小玲, 侯春梅, 等. 基于社交网络的同行评议新模式——基于Peerage of Science与Frontiers平台的案例研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(9):935-940.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201504080314
URL
|
[14] |
盛怡瑾, 初景利. 同行评议质量控制方法研究进展[J]. 出版科学, 2018,26(5):46-53.
|
[15] |
胡晓梅. 科技期刊审稿专家拒审、拖延审稿原因分析及应对办法[J]. 编辑学报, 2019,31(2):187-190.
|
[16] |
贺颖, 邱均平. 同行评议专家遴选的科学计量方法与实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012,56(6):33-37.
URL
|
[17] |
朱伟珠, 李春发. 基于概念知识网络的“小同行” 评议专家遴选方法实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2017,36(7):78-83,88.
|
[18] |
孟美任, 彭希珺. 基于VSM和余弦相似度的稿件精准送审方法[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018,29(10):982-986.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201806190534
URL
|
[19] |
于洋, 段桂花, 张维维, 等. 科技期刊国内外审稿人的选择与合作[J]. 编辑学报, 2016,28(4):362-365.
|
[20] |
陈晓峰, 蔡敬羽, 刘永坚. 科技期刊同行评议中审稿人激励措施研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019,30(11):1157-1163.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201906180443
URL
|
[21] |
钟琳, 高超民. 科技期刊外审专家激励措施扎根研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016,27(3):278-282.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201510100973
URL
|
[22] |
代小秋. 客观评价审稿贡献消除同行评议瓶颈[J]. 编辑学报, 2017,29(5):416-419.
|
[23] |
王景周. 同行评议中审稿人的知识隐藏行为及其控制策略[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019,30(12):1289-1295.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201907220520
URL
|
[24] |
张丹. 论英文科技期刊优秀审稿人队伍的培养[J]. 编辑学报, 2017,31(5):582-585.
|
[25] |
季媛媛, 齐文安, 陈立敏, 等. 中华医学会杂志社同行评议专家披露经济利益冲突的调查分析[J]. 编辑学报, 2019,31(2):179-182.
|
[26] |
陈钢, 周海鹰, 徐锦杭, 等. 医学学术期刊同行评议的质量控制[J]. 科技通报, 2018,34(3):275-277.
|
[27] |
彭芳, 金建华, 董燕萍. 同行评议造假原因分析及防范措施[J]. 编辑学报, 2018,30(3):240-243.
|
[28] |
赵艳静, 王新英, 何静菁. 防止同行评议造假的可行性措施[J]. 编辑学报, 2017,29(2):142-144.
|
[29] |
王维朗, 黄江华, 游滨, 等. 科技期刊同行评议中编辑-审稿专家-作者之间关系的重构与强化[J]. 编辑学报, 2019,31(2):145-147.
|
[30] |
盛怡瑾, 胡克兴, 刘徽, 等. 同行评议形式中的编辑权力分析[J]. 编辑学报, 2019,31(2):148-151.
|
[31] |
潘俊成, 邓素平. 期刊同行评议中参与者基于区块链技术的科技关系重构[J]. 出版广角, 2020(6):50-52,70.
|
[32] |
刘丽萍, 刘春丽. 开放同行评议利弊分析与建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017,28(5):389-395.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201704270323
URL
|
[33] |
王凌峰, 詹雅晴. 知识工作自动化与论文出版方式变革:“预印本+自组织同行评议”模式[J]. 情报探索, 2019(3):1-5.
|
[34] |
张学颖, 罗萍. Web 3.0时代学术期刊开放同行评议的实质和审稿模型构建[J]. 编辑学报, 2016,28(3):220-223.
|
[35] |
陈培颖, 陈倩, 李娜, 等. 国内学术期刊同行评议现状的调研——基于国内自动化领域作者群和评审专家群[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016,27(1):3-9.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201505180435
URL
|
[36] |
张春丽. 科技期刊同行评议形式的适应性研究[M]//刘志强. 学报编辑论丛. 上海: 上海大学出版社, 2019: 79-85.
|
[37] |
Teixeira da Silva J A, Al-Khatib A, Katavić V, et al. Establishing sensible and practical guidelines for desk rejections[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2018,24(4):1347-1365.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9921-3
URL
pmid: 28776148
|
[38] |
Bazi T. Peer review:Single-blind,double-blind,or all the way-blind?[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2020,31(3):481-483.
URL
pmid: 31820012
|
[39] |
Publons. 2018 global state of peer review[EB/OL]. [2020-06-25]. https://publons.com/static/Publons-Global-State-Of-Peer-Review-2018.pdf.
URL
|
[40] |
Transparent peer review at Nature Communications[J]. Nature Communications, 2015,6:10277.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10277
URL
pmid: 26656083
|
[41] |
Nature will publish peer review reports as a trial[J]. Nature, 2020,578(7793):8.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00309-9
URL
pmid: 32025024
|
[42] |
IOP. Peer review models on IOP journals[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://publishingsupport.iopscience.iop.org/questions/peer-review-models-on-iop-journals.
URL
|
[43] |
JMIR. Peer review process[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://www.jmir.org/about/editorialPolicies#peerReview Process.
URL
|
[44] |
BMC. Advancing peer review at BMC[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://www.biomedcentral.com/about/advancing-peer-review.
URL
|
[45] |
Research involvement and engagement. Reviewer guidelines[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/about/reviewer-guidelines.
URL
|
[46] |
Chambers C. What's next for registered reports?[J]. Nature, 2019,573(7773):187.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6
URL
pmid: 31506624
|
[47] |
What science looks like[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2019,3(8):763.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0652-0
URL
pmid: 31332297
|
[48] |
Clarke P, Buckell J, Barnett A. Registered reports:Time to radically rethink peer review in health economics[J]. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 2020,4(1):1-4.
doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-00190-x
URL
pmid: 31975349
|
[49] |
Munafò M R. Improving the efficiency of grant and journal peer review:Registered reports funding[J]. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2017,19(7):773.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx081
URL
pmid: 28387844
|
[50] |
Elsevier. Results masked review:Peer review without publication bias[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/reviewers-update/results-masked-review-peer-review-without-publication-bias
URL
|
[51] |
Elsevier. Results-masked-review articles:Guidance for authors and reviewers[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/AuthorReviewer Guidelines ResultsMaskedReviewArticleJVB.pdf
URL
|
[52] |
Nature will trial the publication of peer-review reports[J]. Nature, 2020,578(7598):8.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00309-9
URL
|
[53] |
BMC. Advancing peer review at BMC[EB/OL]. [2020-06-25]. https://www.biomedcentral.com/about/advancing-peer-review.
URL
|
[54] |
Davis P. Wither portable peer review[EB/OL]. [2020-05-10]. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/03/20/wither-portable-peer-review/.
URL
|
[55] |
Research Square. Customized solutions to match your editorial needs[EB/OL]. [2020-05-10]. .
URL
|
[56] |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Interactive public peer review[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/peer_review/interactive_review_process.html.
URL
|
[57] |
常唯, 李自乐, 王成, 等. 开放评议与双盲评议在国际科技期刊质量控制中的价值[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016,27(1):18-24.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201511071058
URL
|
[58] |
Peer J. Consideration of prior peer reviews[EB/OL]. [2020-06-13]. https://peerj.com/about/author-instructions.
URL
|
[59] |
Peerage of Science. Participating journals[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://www.peerageofscience.org/journals/.
URL
|
[60] |
JMIR Preprints. Journal description[EB/OL]. [2020-06-13]. .
URL
|
[61] |
Publons. How does Publons integrate with ORCID?[EB/OL]. [2020-06-25]. https://publons.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/12000067396-how-does-publons-in-tegrate-with-orcid-.
URL
|
[62] |
COVID-19 publishers open letter of intent-rapid review[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://oaspa.org/covid-19-publishers-open-letter-of-intent-rapid-review.
URL
|
[63] |
Scholarly publishers are working together to maximize efficiency during COVID-19 pandemic[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://oaspa.org/scholarly-publishers-working-together-during-covid-19-pandemic.
URL
|
[64] |
COST. Memorandum of understanding for the implementation of a European concerted research action designated as COST Action TD1306:New frontiers of peer review (PEERE)[EB/OL].[2020-06-05]. https://www.cost.eu/actions/TD1306/#downloads.
URL
|
[65] |
孙力炜, 侯春梅, 迟秀丽, 等. 同行评议过程中专家的回报模式分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016,27(11):1146-1150.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201607130639
URL
|
[66] |
金伟. 审稿人谈审稿[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2002,13(2):119-121.
URL
|
[67] |
Peer J. Open access publication prices[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://peerj.com/pricing/.
URL
|
[68] |
Elsevier. Role of a reviewer[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/role#rec.
URL
|
[69] |
Peerage of Science. The reviewer prize 2017[EB/OL]. [2020-06-05]. https://www.peerageofscience.org/the-reviewer-prize-2017/.
URL
|
[70] |
Publons. Publons ECR reviewers' choice award[EB/OL]. [2020-06-20]. https://publons.com/community/awards/peer-review-awards-2018.
URL
|
[71] |
Communications Physics. Outstanding referees[EB/OL]. [2020-06-20]. https://www.nature.com/commsphys/referees/outstanding-referees.
URL
|
[72] |
IOP. Reviewer awards [2020-06-26]. https://publishingsupport.iopscience.iop.org/questions/reviewer-awards/.
URL
|
[73] |
Elsevier. Reviewer recognition platform[EB/OL]. [2020-06-23]. https://www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/peer-review/reviewer-recognition-platform.
URL
|
[74] |
Elsevier. Reviewer recognition platform[EB/OL]. [2020-06-23]. https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com.
URL
|
[75] |
Decentralized science[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://decentralized.science.
URL
|
[76] |
Publons. What is an “excellent” review?[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://publons.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/12000022369-what-is-an-excellent-review-.
URL
|
[77] |
Mcdowell G S, Knutsen J D, Graham J M,et al. Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts[J]. eLife, 2019,8:e48425.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.48425
URL
pmid: 31668163
|
[78] |
UNSILO. About UNSILO technical checks[EB/OL]. [2020-06-23]. https://unsilo.ai/unsilo-tech-checks/.
URL
|
[79] |
Houle T. An introduction to StatReviewer[EB/OL]. [2020-05-17]. https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/3.3_Houle.pdf.
URL
|
[80] |
Houle T. Statreviewer:Automated manuscript analysis[EB/OL]. [2020-05-17]. https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/6.4-Houle.pdf.
URL
|
[81] |
Frontiers. AI-enhanced peer review:Frontiers launches next generation of efficient,high-quality peer review[EB/OL]. [2020-06-10]. https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/12/14/artificial-intelligence-peer-review-assistant-aira/.
URL
|
[82] |
Publons. Publons reviewer connect[EB/OL]. [2020-06-25]. https://publons.com/benefits/reviewer-connect.
URL
|
[83] |
Clarivate analytics. ScholarOne manuscripts release notes:release v4.22.[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/download/39909/.
URL
|
[84] |
杜耀文. 同行评审:我们拒绝“拼夕夕”[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-557555-1127326.html.
URL
|
[85] |
Beck T. Combating image misuse in science:New Humboldt database provides “missing link”[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/combating-image-misuse-in-science-new-humboldt-database-provides-missing-link.
URL
|
[86] |
Acuna D E, Brookes P S, Kording K P. Bioscience-scale automated detection of figure element reuse[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://doi.org/10.1101/269415.
URL
|
[87] |
Kovanis M, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, et al. Evaluating alternative systems of peer review:A large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,113(1):651-671.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2375-1
URL
pmid: 29056795
|
[88] |
治丹丹. 区块链技术支持下科技期刊同行评议中编辑-作者-读者-专家新型关系重构[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019,30(10):1039-1045.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201906210451
URL
|
[89] |
Heaven D. The age of AI peer reviews[J]. Nature, 2018,563(7733):609-610.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07245-9
URL
pmid: 30482927
|
[90] |
Rajesh A, Cloud G, Harisinghani M G. Improving the quality of manuscript reviews:Impact of introducing a structured electronic template to submit reviews[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2013,200(1):20-23.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8299
URL
pmid: 23255737
|
[91] |
COPE. Core practices[EB/OL]. [2020-07-05]. https://publicationethics.org/core-practices.
URL
|
[92] |
Editorial Policy Committee. CSE's white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications[EB/OL]. [2020-07-11]. https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/.
URL
|
[93] |
Hindle S, Saderi D. Preprint journal clubs:Your opinions revealed[J]. Authorea, 2017[2020-07-11]. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151193754.44459059.
URL
|
[94] |
Hooper M, Barbour V, Walsh A, et al. Designing integrated research integrity training:Authorship,publication,and peer review[J]. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2018,3:2.
doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0046-2
URL
|
[95] |
Publons. Learn to peer review with confidence[EB/OL]. [2020-07-11]. https://publons.com/community/academy/.
URL
|
[96] |
PREreview. About PREreview[EB/OL].[2020-07-11]. https://content.prereview.org/about/.
URL
|
[97] |
任艳青, 靳炜, 翁彦琴. 撤销论文的学术不端行为新特征及启示[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019,30(12):1251-1258.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201903090150
URL
|
[98] |
Baas J, Fennell C. When peer reviewers go rogue—Estimated prevalence of citation manipulation by reviewers based on the citation patterns of 69,000 reviewers[EB/OL]. [2020-06-30]. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3339568.
URL
|
[99] |
Chaplain M, Kirschner D, Iwasa Y. JTB editorial malpractice:A case report[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2020,488(3):110171.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110171
URL
|
[100] |
Wren J D, Valencia A, Kelso J. Reviewer-coerced citation:Case report,update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention[J]. Bioinformatics, 2019,35(18):3217-3218.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz071
URL
pmid: 30698640
|
[101] |
van Noorden R. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse[J]. Nature, 2020,578(7794):200-201.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00335-7
URL
pmid: 32047304
|
[102] |
李金珍, 庄景春, 邱炳武. 《心理学报》开放性同行评审方式探索及初步成效[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(2):139-142.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201409250929
URL
|