中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 726-734. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202102190152

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术期刊与科学基金通信作者标注规范管理及对策——以国内管理科学类重要期刊为例

高杰1)(), 张涵2),*(), 王桂平3)   

  1. 1)山东大学国际创新转化学院,山东省青岛市即墨区滨海路72号 266237
    2)中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京市海淀区中关村北一条15号 100190
    3)天津大学仁爱学院,天津市团泊新城博学苑 301636
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-19 修回日期:2021-04-06 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 张涵 E-mail:littlehope@126.com;zhanghan@casisd.cn
  • 作者简介:高 杰(ORCID:0000-0002-1945-3048),博士,副研究员,E-mail: littlehope@126.com;|王桂平,硕士,讲师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“规模视角下中国创新研究群体的团队合作与创新质量研究”(71904101);国家自然科学基金项目“科学基金资助演化分析及发展成效评价研究”(L2024007)

Standardized management and countermeasures of marking corresponding authors of academic journals and scientific fund: Taking major journals of management science as an example

GAO Jie1)(), ZHANG Han2),*(), WANG Guiping3)   

  1. 1) School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Shandong University, 72 Binhai Road, Jimo District, Qingdao 266237, China
    2) Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Zhongguancun Beiyitiao, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    3) Ren'ai College, Tianjin University, Boxueyuan, Tuanbo New City, Tianjin 301636, China
  • Received:2021-02-19 Revised:2021-04-06 Online:2021-06-15 Published:2021-06-15
  • Contact: ZHANG Han E-mail:littlehope@126.com;zhanghan@casisd.cn

摘要:

【目的】 探讨国家自然科学基金委员会(以下简称“基金委”)与国内管理学重要期刊通信作者要求规范化的现状、问题与关系等,为中国科技期刊与基金委的科研诚信与学术规范建设提供参考。 【方法】 通过对学术规范信息的检索分析以及调研访谈,就基金委与科技期刊对通信作者要求的规范化等内容展开比较分析。 【结果】 基金委对于通信作者的规范化以及科研诚信的要求在逐年增强,而30种国内管理学重要期刊在这些方面的规范与建设还有提升空间。 【结论】 国内科技期刊对通信作者规范的要求与标准,以及与之配套的科研诚信和学术规范建设需继续完善,并与基金委等资助机构形成体系对接与良性互动,促进科技治理体系的完善。

关键词: 学术期刊, 通信作者, 管理科学类期刊, 规范管理

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper explores the status quo and problems in the standardized management of corresponding authors by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and major management science (MS) journals in China and the relationship between the requirements of the two, which is expected to help enhance scientific integrity and academic standardization in Chinese scientific journals and NSFC. [Methods] Through the retrieval and analysis of related academic norms, investigation, and interview, we compared the requirements of NSFC and scientific journals for standardizing corresponding authors. [Findings] NSFC has been tailoring the requirements to strengthen corresponding author standardization and scientific integrity, while the 30 major MS journals should further reinforce the above managements. [Conclusions] Chinese scientific journals should further improve the requirements and standards for corresponding authors, intensify scientific integrity and academic standardization, and follow the requirements of NSFC and other funding agencies to improve the scientific management system.

Key words: Academic journal, Corresponding author, Management science journal, Standardized management